Join your Reds teammates and subscribe to Liverpool FC now
A fool who fired a rocket at the Liver Building came out of court.
Matthew Egglesden plunged into chaos at Pier Head as thousands of Liverpool enthusiasts celebrated the Reds’ Premier League victory in June.
The 19-year-old unleashed two high-powered rockets “The Reborn King,” one of which turned to the crowd, families and children.
The moment hit a balcony on the first floor of the Liver Building listed as Grade I, causing a fireplace on the synthetic lawn and terraces and causing damage for about 30,000 euros.
The teenager passed to police through his father, who saw photographs of him on Liverpool’s ECHO online page and confronted his son, who made a confession in tears.
Egglesden of Turning Lane, Scarisbrick, later admitted a charge of arson, accepting that he intentionally fired a rocket at construction while reckless.
But he received a suspended sentence after Liverpool Crown Court learned today that he came here from a smart family, had a clever task and a realistic prospect of rehabilitation.
The court heard that Egglesden and others intentionally fired rockets at the Liver Building, mistakenly thinking it was lit up in blue because it houses the headquarters of Everton FC.
Judge Andrew Menary, CR, said: “I have no doubt that you did this because you and others there that night knew it was a construction related to your rival team, Everton Football Club. “
The opinion ruled that the construction was illuminated in red, white and blue to commemorate Armed Forces Day.
However, he said, “You and other stupid people around you think it was similar to everton Football Club. “
He added: “You weren’t the only one aiming for construction this way. It turns out that every time a fireworks demonstration hits the construction, the crowd applauds.
“It is an absolutely outrageous and shameful behavior on the part of all those involved.
“This kind of vandalism embarrasses Liverpool Football Club, it has an effect on the city’s reputation around the world and, because of your participation, it also makes you a general disgrace.
“There were probably stupid fans who applauded their movements that night, but I’m sure the vast majority of Liverpool enthusiasts in this city and around the world will be horrified by their movements.
“They risked tarnishing the club’s Premier League achievements this year. “
They heard how the incident spread around 10 p. m. on Friday, June 26.
Christopher Taylor, the accuser, said the crowds had accumulated despite warnings from the local government and Merseyside police due to the coronavirus pandemic.
Commander Kim Carter said the crowd consisted of a combination of families and children, young people and older adults, many of whom enjoyed the celebrations and were for the police.
However, he said that “a lot of alcohol” was fed and that glass bottles had been thrown at officials and that a fireworks demonstration had been directed towards them, so they withdrew.
She said a member of the public told her that the explanation of why the fireworks were directed to the Liver Building because it was lit in blue and some enthusiasts had “offended” it because it contained the headquarters of its rival team.
Taylor said video footage widely shared on social media showed a firework fired through Egglesden in a unique T-shirt, hitting the balcony at 10:19 p. m. , before the flames could be seen.
Get the latest crime statistics on your – enter your zip code below
Firefighters were called at 10:20 p. m. and sent six trucks for fire locations and one aircraft with an aerial platform, such as crews and 4 high-ranking officers for fire locations to the site.
They arrived at 10:26 p. m. and a firefighter a ladder hose extinguished the fire, preventing it from spreading further or within the building.
Mr Taylor said the maintenance charge through glassmakers, masons and specialized roofers eur 29,506.
Building operators have demanded insurance, but said construction could be ignited for Armed Forces day and NHS events.
They said they also had to reassure visitors that they would use the balcony suite for weddings, while firefighters estimated the charge for their reaction at 3,183. 60 euros.
Egglesden confronted his father the next morning.
Taylor said she gave the impression of “crying” and spoke of a “slowdown in her life” even before her father saw the Liverpool article ECHO.
When challenged, he described that he was “shattered at the time and crying. “
Taylor said, “He told his father that his friend had bought the fireworks at Bootle and that he was with his friend’s uncle. “
“The defendant said he detonated fireworks but the one who hit the building. “
He said that as a family, they had to call the police to report their son.
Officials went to his house and arrested him and, during the interview, he made no comment, he still made a list statement, in which he agreed to blow up fireworks in the air, but did not intend to cause harm to the thieves.
Receive newsletters with the latest Liverpool ECHO news, sports and updates by signing up here.
He said, “I’m so sorry for my movements and I’m going to offer to pay for the damage. “
The pre-conviction report noted that Egglesden, who has never been convicted and turns 20 on Sunday, was “really sorry” and apologized for the damage he had caused.
Simon Driver, in defence, warned that there was “little or no planning” in the crime, admitted that his consumer had brought fireworks to the site.
He said Egglesden, whose circle of relatives was in court for him, was of “good character” and had references from his employers and a variety of adults who knew him well in his local community.
Driver said: “Together, these references paint a picture of a sensible, guilty and commercial young man whose crime is so misplaced that at first glance it is difficult to reconcile those portraits with the June 26 photographs. “
He said the pre-sentencing report found that Egglesden made a series of “silly decisions” and showed “immaturity” in his actions.
Driver said Egglesden had “deeply regretted” his embarrassment with his family.
He said: “It has become the face of all that was that night and the main purpose of public attention. “
Driver said his consumer had been subjected to “open hostility” online, adding that much of this had also been aimed at his family, which is a “heavy burden” for a 19-year-old.
He said his circle of relatives continued to help him, but “continued help deserves not to be with forgiveness,” adding, “They have a very grim view of their misconduct. “
Mr Driver stated that his parents had indeed imposed a curfew and that his respectable employer with which he is an apprentice had also been “very critical”, but that he would soon have his point 3 in the company.
He suggested a sentence to preserve Egglesden’s custody so that he could continue this learning and stated that the report concluded that it did not pose a threat or danger to the public and that he had a “realistic prospect of rehabilitation. “
We have a Facebook organization to show you the latest court stories in one place.
It will provide case reports related to Liverpool Crown Court and Merseyside.
To sign in and get updates here.
You can also visit our court stenographer’s Facebook page.
Mr Driver stated that his consumer had stored 4000 euros and earned around 1300 euros net depending on the month and that he can pay the refund out of his own pocket.
He said: “This is a reckless act of brazen stupidity and I ask the court to recognize it and withdraw from the imposition of an early prison sentence. “
Judge Menary said the maintenance charge is around 29,000 euros, however, “the damage to the reputation of the people and Liverpool Football Club is even greater. “
However, he affirmed that the young user is only 19 years old, had no criminal record, came from a “good supportive family” and had a “good secure job”, with positive references and “good clients for the future. “
He admitted that his movements were “completely out of character” and that he “certainly got carried away, emboldened by the wrong celebrations and perhaps also affected by drinking. “
Judge Menary admitted that Egglesden’s idea that firing a fireworks demonstration would probably have “little effect on a giant stone building,” however, given the length of the rocket, he deserved to have stopped to think.
He said, “Other people like you and others have behaved so foolishly. “
Judge Menary said Egglesden might not complain if he locked him up, but admitted that he repented and that his “dismayed” parents denounced him and took steps to punish him, while comments on social media were “a huge burden on you when you were young. carry. “
He spent his 12 months in detention, suspended for 18 months, with a 15-day rehabilitation activity requirement.
Judge Menary ordered him to perform a hundred hours of unpaid painting and meet a three-month home curfew, starting at 8 p. m. 6 a. m. every day.
He told Egglesden to pay 3,183. 60 euros in return to the Merseyside Fire and Rescue Service and a contribution of 3,000 euros to the loss suffered through the Liver Building.
Follow Neil on Twitter here
You can read more about him here.
Send him a neil. docking@reachplc. com
You can your Facebook page for all your court reports.
Or as Facebook’s organization of ECHO court instances for the latest news or updates.
Sign up here to receive our new weekly Echo Court Files email. You’ll also see our messaging options.
I like ECHO’s Facebook page and @livechonews on Twitter
Speaking after the case, Crown suggested that Christopher Taylor of CPS Mersey Cheshire said: “Matthew Egglesden admitted at an initial level that he had fired the rocket, but said he did not intend to cause any harm. construction is almost guaranteed to cause damage.
“At night it turns out that he has been reckless in terms of the final results of his actions. This has been the night the city prided itself on its achievements.
Can we be covered in Merseyside?
Instead, photographs travel the world with riots, disorder and pain as a result of Liverpool FC’s successful celebrations.
“Matthew Egglesden had his component to play in this incredibly negative ad and will have to be informed of it. “