As Labor Day approaches and the number of positive tests for Covid-19 on college campuses continues to increase, an increasing number of public schools have re-closed the dormitories and replaced online courses.However, even though chemistry labs are closed, legal libraries are locked and economic buildings are emptied, many public schools continue to advance with plans for their 2020 football season, even though the classic student framework may not even be on campus to enjoy those games.
The most notable example of a giant public school that makes plans to host fall football despite the close of live instruction is the University of North Carolina, where Chancellor Kevin M.Guskiewicz announced last Monday that all categories of college students would go live during the semester, but that school football would continue as planned.Today, Tar Heels head football coach Mack Brown continues to prepare his just over a hundred school football players for the team’s season opening on September 12 against Syracuse University.During this time, the rest of the UNC student framework resorted to catepassries in Zoom.
For many at The Greater North Carolina Community, the opportunity to watch school football on television at this tricky and unprecedented time might seem comforting, but from an educational point of view, it makes no sense for a school to be offering live football matches when it doesn’t even offer live courses. In addition, one may simply wonder whether school football players deserve to be treated as must-have workers, while individual schools and the NCAA still refuse to legally recognize them as “workers.”
The preference of school rectors like the University of North Carolina to maintain their fall football season at any price is largely driven by the economy.A May 2020 article in ESPN.com through Mark Schlabach and Paula Lavigne estimates that the Cancellation of the Fall 2020 School Football Season would charge NCAA member schools more than $4 billion.For some individual schools, perhaps adding the University of North Carolina, the cancellation fee can cost $100 million.
It is difficult to deny the importance of school football in many state primary schools, especially for someone like me, who is a professor of sports law, a graduate in law, business, sports control and education.However, the economic price of school football is a pandemic.deserve not to be the essence of the decision-making process, at least for public schools.
Leaving aside the complex and nuanced question of whether a personal school deserves to continue its fall football seasons as a global fitness pandemic, the question of whether public schools deserve to persist with football, especially on campuses that have in a different way closed the school live, spins.quite directly as simple.forward.As states invest taxpayers’ money in higher education, the university’s duty is meant to prepare academics for an active life and greater citizenship tasks.A university’s duty is not to create seven-figure paid jobs for sports administrators and coaches, or to provide entertainment, using “student” work, to the entire community.
Of course, Covid-19 has not created inequalities in the citations underlying school football, nor the gap between the point of precedence that some university presidents position on football compared to other university efforts.But Covid-19 certainly highlights the structural disorders of many public university systems, as well as the questionable nature of state universities that devote more effort to advertising sports control than teaching in the classroom.
In much of the world, public schools seem to recognize the price of offering athletic opportunities to students, but in many countries around the world, global college athletics is built on principles to maintain student empowerment, fitness, and leadership, not the operation of an Advertising activity in which a limited number of administrators, sports administrators and coaches earn giant sums. Athletes are denied the opportunity to share in percentage gains.
Of course, there is nothing wrong with academics playing competitive and organized football, but there is something fundamentally wrong with public educational establishments that prioritize advertising sports as a pandemic over public education in general.exceptional income from football that its football activities take precedence over its educational mission.
Public schools want to start doing much more to fulfill their true mission.Now, Covid-19, this turns out to be a good time to get started.
_________________
Marc Edelman ([email protected]) is a law professor at Baruch College’s Zicklin School of Business and founder of Edelman Law.He is co-author of the Wisconsin Law Review article “College Football in the Time of COVID-19” and many articles on sports and school law.
I am a professor of law at the Zicklin School of Business (City University of New York), where I studied sports law, antitrust laws, gambling and intellectual property.
I am a professor of law at the Zicklin School of Business (City University of New York), where I studied sports law, antitrust laws, gambling and intellectual property.I also teach the only course in the country on fantasy sports law and legal supply.recommendation in the industry.