Release date: Thursday, August 6, 2020 12:30 p.m.
Mesut Ozil refused to receive a payment asking how Arsenal would use the money. Fifty-five layoffs later, he’s to blame.
The other two players who chose to suffer a pay cut were never named.
Ozil did not make public his decision, not that he had to do it, and that it would not even matter: criticism had already been established for a long time about how he had let down the team, the game and society itself.
ESPN’s JAMES Olley provided some clarification, saying that the German ” wanted assurances” about the club’s long-term monetary plans and that he would be ” ready to settle for a top wage cut ” if Arsenal clarified ” how cash and long-term monetary implications would be used. ».
I wanted to know that stored cash would help the club and its staff more than just the billionaire owner, basically.
Four months later, despite widespread pay cuts throughout the club, Arsenal announced that 55 workers would be laid off. Ozil didn’t make that decision. Kroenke Sports and Entertainment did.
So why is this the last page of the Daily Mirror, with “Ozil’s salary for a month” in an incendiary subtitle meant to make footballers the enemy here?
– Allie Hodgkins-Brown (@AllieHBNews) August 5, 2020
And why does The Sun feel the need to use a photo of Ozil (“always at 350,000 euros a week”) and Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang (“ready for mass climbing”) as part of the cover of its last page?
Should they reject the situations presented to them and ask for a much lower salary? Would?
Stan Kroenke is the billionaire who proposed employee layoffs, the billionaire who passed his contract to Ozil in first place, and the billionaire who will sanction any new agreement signed through Aubameyang, if he does.
Try to look beyond the simple and lazy goals that footballers are and start pointing the finger of the guilt to where they want to be. This one’s the owner’s. Ozil, on the other hand, has the right to doubt his motives.
“Lingard and Martial forgive Utd’s careless redness to prepare for a quarter-final match against FC Copenhagen”
What a shame it would have been to lose an insignificant lace in a draw they had already won, having made nine adjustments to the team that started their last game nine days ago and many holidays ago. Imagine the “redness” if you had passed only 4 targets out of six.
Still, “red” and all that.
Anyway, how embarrassed Manchester United would be to belong to the Europa League is a mystery. After all:
“While this festival is the poor father, even the League Cup, it means something.”
A reminder that winning the League Cup is to qualify for a festival that is “very smart the poor father.” And that Neil Custis is paid to claim that anyone would rather win this than the Europa League.
– Football365 (F365) 6 August 2020
You’ll have to love this 3-3-4 lineup, the selection of a loose agent who charges Chelsea 8.3 million pounds of salary and the variety of Premier League, FA Cup and Europa League winner Phil Jones. Would Shkodran Mustafi or John Stones have been selected if Jones had won the League Cup?
“The horror spell of the 505,000 euro a week flop still ends after Ole Gunnar Solskjaer proved that an agreement had been reached” – The Sun.
“Alexis Sanchez’s contract with Manchester United for 500,000 euros consistent with the week has been terminated by mutual consent” – Daily Mirror website.
“It has been reported that United is paying a significant percentage of Sanchez’s $400,000 a week’s salary a week…” – a story on sanchez’s Daily Mirror website.
“The Chilean foreigner has been on loan from Inter since August, but United has covered a portion of his salary of 390,000 euros a week” – The Guardian.
Perhaps now that he’s gone, can anyone tell us how there can be a 170,000 euro hole consistent with the week in the way Sanchez’s salaries have been reported in other media?
“The Liverpool John W Henry alludes to the exciting developments of the Reds” tomorrow”
Mediawatch then mocked that the “always be in the morning” appointments were skewed to raise the news of anfield’s approach.
An apology is due. They return on Thursday to fulfill this promise:
“Adama Traoré receives Liverpool assured for rejection of the play”
Fair. It’s ‘exciting’, a ‘development’ and it was ‘tomorrow’. I’m sorry to doubt you … oh, this first paragraph is a descent.
“Adama Traoré” is “good enough to play for Liverpool or Manchester City, according to former Wolves and City star Joleon Lescott.”
And this, and gentlemen, is the “Liverpool guarantee” given to Traoré. A day ago. To Joleon swallowing Lescott.
Apologies canceled.
The slug is even better: man-utd-sancho-transfer-agent-rio-ferdinand. It’s official.
So what is the “old message” that “alludes” to Sancho’s future?
– Rio Ferdinand (rioferdy5) 4 August 2020
Bloody hell. It’s over.
They’ll do that. That’s how it works.
Update your browser to view this website. Update my browser now
×