According to The Athletic, the FA “asked Nuno for comments” and gave him and the Wolves three days rushed to plead with them.
This provides the FA 3 days later to determine whether to set a rate and the wolves will have the same time to respond if a punishment is transmitted, as well as 10 consecutive days to have a hearing if they disagree with the decision. .
Watch European football with beIN SPORTS and ESPN in Kayo. New to Kayo? Get your 14-day loose trial and start streaming instantly>
That comes after Nuno targeted Mason after the Wolves’ 2–1 loss to Burnley, “he didn’t have the quality to whistle a Premier League game. “
He also added that he had told Mason that he was no longer looking for him to officiate more of his games.
“Honestly, I don’t like to say it, but I have to say it because I probably wouldn’t feel good: the referee doesn’t have the quality to beep a match in the Premier League,” Nuno said.
“It’s a challenge we knew. We’ve had Lee Mason before. It’s not about mistakes or decisions, it’s about how you handle the game.
“Players get nervous. Too many voices. He whistles through the voices when some players scream. He doesn’t have it. We’re talking about the festival and obviously it doesn’t have the quality to beep the game.
“I’m very disappointed to say it, disappointed to say it, but I wouldn’t feel smart if I didn’t say it. It’s happened before.
Get the latest news, highlights and football research right in your inbox with Fox Sports Sportmail. Register now!
“I just don’t need to see him anymore. That’s what I told him. I hope you don’t step on one of our games anymore because all the games we have with Lee Mason are the same.
“He didn’t play the players. The players are constantly fighting, both teams. With all the other referees, the game flows, decisions are accepted, there is dialogue. He doesn’t.
Whether Nuno can be charged simply depends on how your comments are interpreted.
If they are critical of Mason’s decisions, he will not be subject to additional scrutiny.
However, the threat to Nuno is that his comments are a non-public or offensive attack on Mason.
FA Rule E3 (1) states: “A player will have to act at all times for the most productive interests of the game and will not have to act in a manner that would get to the point or discredit the game or use any, or a mixture of behavior, serious misconduct, threatening, abusive, indecent or insulting words or behavior. “
The Wolf extreme, Daniel Podence, also expressed frustration at removing Instagram posts, adding two goalkeeper videos holding the ball for more than six seconds.
“I’m going to fight against injustice, other remedies and unfair decisions in life or in football,” Podence is wrong. “And I think we have to check to be older every day. “
“I grew up that goalkeepers have six/seven seconds to receive the ball. “
It also included a video of James Tarkowski colliding with Owen Otasowie, asking, “And the last, but the least . . . Why was Raul (Jiménez) injured? A case of habit like this. Guess what . . . ‘play, play’. »
Nuno’s report is lately being investigated through the FA.
Subscribe to our Fox Sports newsletters
Success!