Jayden Daniels of ASU and Grant Gunnell of Arizona in school football grades

The obvious lack of a site for ASU Quarterback Jayden Daniels continues.

So did his love for Arizona Quarterback Grant Gunnell.

Pro Football Focus recently released its ratings for the return of the Pac-12 quarters and Gunnell is No. 1 on its list with 81. 5.

Daniels is number five with 66. 7.

Gunnell pitched for touchdowns and had an interception last season.

He finished 66% of his passes for 1,239 yards.

He only played three games last season as a rookie in Tucson, sharing time with Khalil Tate.

Daniels pitched for 2,973 yards and 17 touchdowns with two interceptions in his first season at Tempe.

He finished 60. 7% of his passes.

MORE: Jayden Daniels of ASUArray is nowhere on the Pac-12 pre-season team

The pac-12 qualifiers date back to QBs1. Grant Gunnell, Arizona – 81. 52. Kedon Slovis, USC – 78. 83. Chase Garbers, California – 78. 04. 12 Davis Mills, Stanford – 70. 75. Jayden Daniels, ASU – 66. 7 pic. twitter. com/7ceoMP5JvQ

Pro Football Focus ratings and ratings have a different method than many sites.

He evaluates players only in statistics, but in other categories, such as a quarterback’s decision-making, pass accuracy, and time.

Pro Football Focus attempted its ranking:

“This list is largely based on the good luck of beginner quarterback Array. . . , however, it is also affected by the scenario surrounding it with other quarterbacks on the list who may have won shots or injuries. No list is ever a hundred, with a percentage of accuracy, but with our great amount of knowledge at our fingertips, we get as close as possible. “

He continued: “These ratings are largely based on the PFF ratings of individual players for the season. Avoidance of negatively classified games, propensity for definitively evaluated games, festival strength and price for a team win are also The effect of a player on his team’s attack, his expected problems added through dropback (or hasty attempt) and the overall accuracy of our complex knowledge of ball mapping are also take into account , among other factors.

Are you a fan? Stay informed. Subscribe to azcentral. com today.

Obviously, according to the site, this leads them to Gunnell being a better quarterback than Daniels.

This is the first time PFF has had Gunnell above Daniels.

In August, Gunnell ranked Gunnell as the country’s number thirteen quarterback. Yes, not thirteen.

He also positioned himself as Quarterback No. 2 pac-12.

Daniels ranked 63rd overall and seventh among Pac-12 field marshals.

MORE: ASU Football: Jayden Daniels quarterback rating in 2020 is described as ‘totally inept’

Pac-12 QB nationally ranked PFF7 – K Slovis, USC13 – Gunnell G, UA21 – C Garbers, Cal38 – J Bentley, Utah47 – T Shough, UO55 – D Mills, Stan63 – J Daniels, ASU77 – J Sirmon, UW85 – T Gebbia, OSU93 – C Cooper, WSU96 – DTR, UCLA113 – Lytle / Lewis Walnut, CU https://t. co/IxAQaWJi1R

Anthony Treash wrote of Gunnell: “Gunnell has had only three openings and a total of 185 abandonments on his true first-year crusade last year, but it has been beyond expectations from the start. Its accuracy is what really stood out, and it’s just behind Slovis for the most productive in the country. Gunnell threw an exact pass in 65. 9% of his pitches beyond the punch line, which he would have placed third in school football if he had qualified for a rank. Like Penix, Gunnell is a waiting to escape. “

He wrote of Daniels: “Daniels is a skilled creator of resolutions as a smuggler, which is not unusual for a genuine one-year-old student. The big fear, and the explanation for why we’re not positive about his 2020, is that 17% of his passes in 2019 resulted in a failure in the QB. Daniels’ accuracy is well below average, but the herbal skill is there. “

In August, he also named Gunnell as second-team quarterback Pac-12 on his Pac-12 preseason football team.

Daniels even got an honorable mention.

In January, Pro Football Focus named Daniels as the least pin in the Pac-12.

Cam Mellor wrote: “An amazing athlete this season for the Sun Devils, Daniels had a wonderful year, completing 17 landings in opposition to just two interceptions. However, his accuracy was simply not there for most of the year, as he left a ton of Despite the total number of incredibly noisy landings, Daniels actually finished the season as pac-12’s least accurate quarterback, throwing a precise pass only 48. 4% of the time. He hasn’t missed much at times, even to finish his career as a possible three- or four-year-old opener, he’ll want his accuracy in the coming years. When he batted, his thirteen great pitches were incredibly fun to watch.

MORE: Pac-12 quarter-final qualifying for 2020: debate between Jayden Daniels and Kedon Slovis continues

He placed it 72nd among school quarterbacks at the time and number 10 among field marshals in pac-12.

Yes, no, in the country and No. 10 between the 12-quarter Pac-12.

Arizona quarterbacks last season, Tate and Gunnell, ranked 25th on that list.

Mellor wrote of the Arizona duo last season: “In a year ruled by Tate’s healthy return to the roster this season, Gunnell was the duo’s main passer. Tate has ruled with his legs but has played 4 games without landing and only one game opposite the Power-5 festival with a passing score of over 71. 2. On the court, Tate eclipsed 500 yards with 254 yards on 42 designed carries and another 308 on pushes, breaking 17 tackles in the process. The sign that the long term is in smart hands, however, was Gunnell, as he had a passing score of at least 72. 2 in each and every outing this season, compared to Tate’s 3 games with such. ratings. He also wasn’t limited to throwing and shooting, as he finished the year with a mark of 27 passes from 10 yards or more downhill for five touchdowns and no interceptions. He was the only quarterback in the country to attempt at least 20 passes on throws over 10 yards into the box and didn’t make a loss-worthy pass when he had five vital throws. in such launches.

You can all kinds of formulas and analyze and analyze many of the numbers (which Pro Football Focus clearly did) to sort the rooms.

Anyone who has seen Daniels in action knows that the long term looks very promising in Arizona State.

Much brighter than being ranked 63rd or 72nd in the nation, or number five or number 7 or even number 10 in the Pac-12.

MORE: Arizona Soccer: Grant Gunnell’s 15 Most Sensible Quarterback Ratings for 2020 Come With Questions

Gunnell? Who?

PFF uses this new calculation that none of us can do either.

Responding 50% to the overstatement of No. 1, 50% to the default of No. 5, the PFF ranked Daniels at 63 and Gunnell at 13 in all FBS. The PFF that carried out these tests must be a graduate of the UofA. pic. twitter. com/qBfIVh8nTt

Be sure to mention that you have played 8 hahaha games

That’s why U of A has all those four- and five-star receivers. . . Oh, wait, it’s ASU!

Is it worse at best?

Someone will have to hack the @PFF_College account and start sending jokes ?

MORE: ASU Football’s Jayden Daniels reaches 2020 school football quarter-finals

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *