Release date: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 10:13 a. m.
Send your emails to theeditor@football365. com. . .
All industries are experiencing adjustments to the prestige quo. Some organizations will survive, but many of them, coupled with the industry leader, will succumb, mainly because they were the maxims in the prestige quo.
The changes are caused by external forces or foreigners who, because they are not attached to the prestige quo, have another vision for the future.
The EPL and EFL style is lately under excessive pressure. It’s been a while, but it’s stuttered with poor team management, spending as groups are willing to spend too much in search of the holy grail, something 95% of groups can’t. Get.
We have noticed that the “giants” of the generation disappear overnight when a new “model” arrives, even if they were well controlled in a different way, they still lost the ship. well-controlled.
The horror expressed through the leaders of the EPL, the EFL, the FA and many outlets about the Big Picture allocation would be amusing if it weren’t already so ridiculous to see how poorly controlled those organizations are. I may not be “fit and decent”, groups are spending too much hope of success and genuine long-term rewards, like a user with a gambling addiction.
How dare these . . . Americans, these . . . Johnny, recently from foreigners who don’t know anything about football, dare to offer a long-term option for our game that can help him and thrive for the next thirty years?
If this does not cause a change, a self-propelled uprising, there will be no long term for 50% of the groups, their small idea leads to their annihilation. We have noticed that many groups have contributed to the administration for more than 30 years and some who have recently broken or, at best, are now languishing in the lower courts. It’s just the canaries of the coal mine. A lot of other people also spent a lot, they were in a dangerous state before COVID hit. Something has to change.
“All this favors the big clubs . . . “I hear you say it. Well, those big clubs are going to survive. These big clubs have several that make them much more money than they do lately in The Big Picture.
. . . Regarding the goals of the Big Picture. La is not whether this will happen . . . it’s only WHEN it’s going to happen.
Well, with “Project Big Picture” on the news, first of all, what terrible name, I, who invented those assignment names?
Anyway, in the concept of Relegation Play Off, similar to the Bundesliga, I wondered who would have played that in the last five years and what we all thought the result would have been, so how I see this will be third in the Premier League. League vs Play Off Winner, my winner predicts in parentheses afterwards.
One of the general prospects of the less discussed transfer turns out to be the elimination of the League Cup, which was absolutely well ignored in favor of the most captivating elements What makes me curious is why this cup arouses so much disdain?
In its defense, the cup starts early, giving us some quick weekday games, regularly has exciting first rounds without replays and ends critically long before the end of the season. Although Man City has been launching the festival in recent times, it was also used to launch unexpected finalists. However, we see other people call it Mickey Mouse cup and a waste of time; If it’s a waste of time, clubs have the opportunity to shape a team for now and give their teens a stimulating first-team delight. Is it probably a loss for everyone if we remove this festival?
I read the email from DC, LAC about the debate about whether good luck with groups is greater than good luck with a team and had to bite because of their conclusion.
In essence, this is the Messi v Ronaldo debate about who is the most productive player due to his possible respective carrier options. The conclusion that an achievement is greater if it comes to good luck with many clubs is so false that it is amazing In my opinion, the key that other people who spread this argument is the word team rather than the club word.
DC is talking about a dominant club, so it’s less difficult to achieve with this club What’s not to be noticed is that a club is going through many groups the life cycle of a feat with many ups and downs. Alex Ferguson is widely known for building 3 wonderful United groups at the time with some falls between the groups. Barcelona in recent years is not the same one that worried Messi at first. A player’s ability to adapt to other groups inside a club and, in some cases, hang out as the club undergoes a transformation is as vital and in some cases more vital than the player moving in multiple TOP groups.
In some cases, the moving player spends less time helping the team and moving to a ready-to-use team generates benefits accordingly. Ronaldo went from being a standout team at Man United to a top-tier Real Madrid team (although he helped turn the team into a winning machine), but then switched to a Juventus team that had won the last seven Serie A titles. All it takes is to win the CL, which is still a painting in progress. This is not to denigrate Ronaldo’s achievements as he is a great player.
However, my view is that it cannot necessarily be concluded that a player who has played in several groups has achieved more than his counterpart in an unmarried club. The key is the quality of the team in which he plays compared to the club. That’s why rating the achievements of individual brilliity in a team game is so subjective. Let’s use our eyes and see what the players have done and appreciate their brilliity.
. . . I enjoyed DC Bac’s email about the players who were Jordans and who were Lebrons. I liked the analogy and wondered who would fall on both sides.
But then I got here with the fact that nomads were more for the difficulty . . . Take Ronaldo as an example.
The Premier League trophy was won at Manchester United, with them at their best, making it not the hardest trophy to win for him.
The moment at Real Madrid, again, the largest club in Spain, to give or receive, and he is the golden boy there. He is phenomenal there, adding numbers that would make an individual in general sick, but he the main stallion in two-horse race.
The third club was Juventus, again, the largest club in Serie A history, which was so big that it can be relegated, see their titles stripped and dominate again.
Now I despise his exploits in some way, only he won those trophies in Leicester, Villareal or Torino. You play something I think we all want to remember, namely:
We like to compare things, we like to debate what’s bigger to have absolutes. I think the VAR has shown us that football doesn’t like absolutes, we like messy drama, we love debate.
Listen to Lee . . . his team won the league for the first time in 30 years and, despite the toughest defeat ever noticed through a protective champion in 4 weeks, discussions such as his team establishing an excellent dynasty that lasted 1000 years.
I have a smart appreciation of the current state of my team, thank you Lee . . . you can do it by learning to do introspection.
Only in the debate about football-likeness, if successful, one of my first contributions to this site was a submission to this past feature and remains my favorite celebrity.
Refresh your browser to view this website. Update my browser now
×