We’re talking about party politics.
Work with us on this one.
You’ll have to come up with a plan.
It fills me with an absolute concern of where we will end up at the end of this pandemic.
It is not undeniable and undeniable, it is a complex work . . . GM other people love us and ask us to make sure we make those informed decisions.
These political parties have a credible argument.
The feeling is that the next fortnight will be the next challenge and we hope the tension will decrease beyond that.
We have paintings to do to decrease the numbers of the units.
There is a certain degree of confidence within the formula that, while it will be difficult, there will be enough capacity within the formula.
Nor is there such a factor, especially among young people.
That’s why I say I hope the government digs here.
This has human consequences.
There are other people who are worried about so many things.
Clearly, the trend is on the rise.
This afternoon Andy Burnham will hold his regular press convention at Covid’s in Greater Manchester.
The moment portion of today’s update will also cover the region’s long-standing area framework, which despite everything approved by the leaders this morning before a public consultation.
However, you will still have to go through the city corridor for a vote, which means the framework is not yet finished.
The press conference replaces the same briefing of Wednesday’s mayor, which provides an update on Covid’s situation, adding hospitals, nursing homes and the community at large.
New knowledge is expected this afternoon, reflecting the existing one throughout the formula in terms of cases, NHS pressures and deaths.
This comes at a time when tension in hospitals here is rising rapidly, with Wigan and Stockport hospitals canceling non-urgent procedures to loosen beds.
Infection rates in the municipality also continue to rise.
This follows a pre-this-week press convention in which the mayor presented “oneGM,” a fundraising effort subsidized through celebrities who added Gary Neville, to provide money to those affected by government “Level Three” restrictions.
Today’s update will cover the fitness scenario in more detail, while discussing the concept of GMSF, the region’s 17-year planning plan for the construction of new homes and businesses.
This has gone through a complicated political era in recent weeks, which has noticed that a massive dispute broke out in Bredbury, which had a chance of derailing the overall plan.
However, Stockport City Council has expanded its plans for this site and executives agreed to the framework at its meeting this morning.
Now you will have to go through all the corridors of the city for a vote, with Stockport, which has no general, the maximum of the council probably to vote against.
If this were to happen, it is known whether the other nine councils would go ahead without the municipality.
The first part of today’s press conference will see Mayor and Deputy Bev Hughes talk about Covid-19, followed by Salford Mayor Paul Dennett and Stockport Chief Elise Wilson talking about the area’s picture.
Follow our updates from 1 p. m.
AB concludes and agrees that GMSF can continue as nine districts, is a “complex puzzle” and cutting a piece would involve many additional costs.
Let’s get in touch about party politics.
If opposition members have concerns, contact him and Elise Wilson, and then destroy him.
Work with us on this one.
He is convinced that the other nine districts will make him “get Stockport on the list. “
It’ll be a commitment. No one will get everything they need from a plan like this.
Let’s take a look to have “one last conversation” about the GMSF.
And the presser foot snuggles up. He thanked you for coming.
That’s it, it’s over. And I’m going to do an infusion.
Have a great weekend.
They are asked if gmSF can continue if Stockport votes.
Yes, we can follow a plan of the nine, pd says, if the other leaders agree. But reiterate yours in Stockport.
EW says there are members in Stockport who “clearly understand” those benefits. That said, if Stockport adopts it, “it will have to do anything else. “
You’ll have to come up with a plan.
This includes searching for about 5,000 more homes.
And it would also put more strain on the board, which would have to expand a new plan.
The GMSF also means access to government infrastructure policy. Opposition leaders are jeopardizing the council’s ability to protect the Green Belt, he said, said that was his goal.
I ask you about Manchester City Council’s plans to cut its budget for the homeless, A Bed Every Night.
AB said he was aware of it. This is a mirrored image of the “individual position” in which the forums are located when refinancing.
Lately there are another 480 people in an ABEN housing unit in GM, along with about 400 hotels that housed the pandemic.
ABEN has gone from being an initial assignment to anything that provides much to others in the ten districts; have been very grateful to the city council for what they have provided, which has also brought them benefits.
But it shows the “impossible position” they find themselves in terms of budget.
What they would say to the government is that if everything they have said about homelessness is serious, they want to do more in terms of municipal funding.
They can’t settle for a primary loss of ABEN, he says. It will do everything for the program, a “personal priority”, but they will also have to recognize the position in which the forums are located.
This is not a sustainable position for them. Possible impossible options face town halls like Manchester.
It fills me with an absolute concern of where we will end up at the end of this pandemic.
A q to the mayor of Salford of the Sunday Times.
Will this plan make it less difficult for developers to consider affordable housing?And do they deserve to build something here without a contribution to segment 106?(This is the contribution of developers that can be used to provide affordable housing, although this does not materialize. )
PD says this is a problem.
If we take this seriously, we will have to reform the entire framework of national plan-making policies. Currently, the owners leave with a lot of cash when the construction developments, thanks to the increase in the price of the construction as a result of the permits of drawing up the plans, this is then played in the monetary equations of the developers. So that everything is reformed.
“It’s anything they’re campaigning for with the national government,” he says.
Elise Wilson says some parts of Stockport are very expensive. Currently, they do not have to be residential land for five years, so there is a big challenge in terms of affordability.
The GMSF is therefore a “real advantage” as it helps build those houses.
Some of Stockport’s most esteemed neighborhoods have GMSF assignments that emphasize an abundant proportion of housing.
Back to AB. They are now a “broad support” for the plan.
Let’s go to the questions.
One about Stockport, first from my colleague Nick Statham and also from the BBC. All opposition parties in Stockport threaten to vote against the GMSF: would it end the project or would there be some form of Stockport in the fold?
How much would the mayor’s credibility be?
Elise Wilson begins. She says they ‘jump forward’.
She says she must ensure that an appropriate participation procedure has been followed. There is a “minority” of clients who decided, “before the game”, that they were interested in this procedure.
It is not undeniable and undeniable, it is a complex work . . . GM other people love us and ask us to make sure we make those informed decisions.
The balance with the latest iteration is a balance between homes, jobs and environmental coverage and she believes we have the right balance.
AB stands out for its credibility.
That would be more about the credibility of opposition parties in Stockport, he says, because they are fair to other people about what that would mean. Stockport is one of the main beneficiaries of GMSF, other words, you don’t want to build as many houses on the green belt as other parts of GM take those figures.
These political parties have a credible argument.
The argument of credibility rests more on them. He reiterates that this is a complex plan.
Call on opposition parties in Stockport: let’s not make this party a political party. If you have any concerns, please contact me. If necessary, let’s edit it, but let’s not break it.
PD says it’s vital that we look at Stockport’s figures.
Stockport is expected to deliver more than 18,400 homes lately. Under the GMSF, that’s about 13,400. Therefore, Stockport are “important beneficiaries” of the framework, he said.
If the opposition rejects it, it will have to supply much more housing in Stockport, which will mean even more of the Green Belt.
If Stockport votes against it, there are other tactics to move forward, he says, but it’s a plan for GM and it’s about avoiding call planning.
They surrender to Paul Dennett, mayor of Salford.
PD says the plan aims to address the housing crisis, adding to offering 50,000 new housing units.
For us, he says, this plan is also an “essential foundation” for our post-Covid-19 recovery, adding to government investment in infrastructure, as well as construction confidence in investment, while guiding where progress will take place.
It is also part of an old green belt attempt, which would expand “chaoticly” if we didn’t have this plan.
There are more than 180,000 houses planned for this project (it’s less than before, for the 20th time, I’ll have to take a look at it).
Now let’s move on to Stockport’s board leader, Elise Wilson.
She says everything Stockport is looking to do downtown at the GMSF.
The long-term work they seek to create, such as ecological expansion and complex fabrics, has the plan that explains them.
Some parts of GM want to strengthen themselves, he says, while others want to remain competitive.
It’s a long story, AB says, now it comes to a conclusion.
The key point on which it must succeed in relation to the GMSF is that the consultation is a “significant listening”.
He says that other people think that consultations are all for display and that no replacements are made, but they can say, he says, that since the first draft in 2016, they have taken wonderful care to pay attention to other people.
There has been a really extensive replacement between the 2016 and 2019 projects, and adjustments to it.
Green belt intake has been reduced by 60% compared to the original plan.
I would possibly report on other significant adjustments to this project, such as the loss of Pennington’s proposal to Wigan, because the council listened to local concerns.
At Bury, Simister’s citizens had been in contact with the scale of planned progression: he believed the considerations were valid and the Bury Council redesigned his plan.
In Oldham, the city council developed a strategy for home generators and got rid of the green belt.
And in Salford and Stockport, there have also been adjustments there.
“Overall, it’s a plan that benefits everyone at GM,” he says. We want to get out of this crisis with a transparent wisdom of where we’re going.
This gives us transparent direction on how they will create quality jobs while protecting the green belt. And the worst thing about all worlds would be to have no plan at all, which would mean that expanders could simply “choose” the sites they need. expand to the fullest.
You’ve listened, you conclude, but now you have a forged plan.
Instead of “feeling defensive” about this plan and treating it as “negative,” you’ll hear “more and more” that will communicate it with confidence.
Bev Hughes is asked if firefighters are worried that other people might light fireworks at home, because Bonfire Night is canceled.
Yes, she says. There are injuries every year, and the fact that other people can’t move on to safer, more organized occasions is a concern.
This press convention is over.
AB says, in reference to the report that was leaked earlier, that it is vital that we remain in the factual position in which we are located, in accordance with what it read earlier.
The feeling is that the next fortnight will be the next challenge and we hope that the tension subsides beyond that.
Asked about a national cut, does he make that argument every time he addresses the government?
It reiterates that it has repeated it over and over again and that it does believe that the prioritization formula is correct.
He also asked about the internal predictions, in an article I wrote last month, that we would have 238 admissions consistent with the day right now, which we didn’t achieve. Is this a testimony to the public or to the NHS?
AB wouldn’t need to claim a lot of credit. The NHS works very hard to manage things and there are only 10 other people who engage with Covid-19; However, when you go up to other people who then test positive once, it gets much higher, even if it’s lower than expected. .
We have paintings to do to decrease the numbers of the units.
Questions from me about the NHS: are you still convinced that the NHS can cope?Can you cope with Covid and the activity?
And secondly, The Independent has just published an article in which it says we are already installing interim extensive care sets here. Can we deal with winter?
AB: it’s another scenario here earlier in the year – the NHS is now looking to do other regime activities.
There is an intelligent degree of confidence within the formula that, it will be difficult, there will be enough capacity within the formula.
He said this was the case.
Also at this time of year, you see the cancellation of elective activity and this has to happen in a few gm, however, “there is no widespread cancellation at this time”.
This is not unusual, he points out, and each and every winter occurs in the NHS.
As for the report published in The Independent, he said he would treat it with great caution. In terms of ICU capacity, there are a hundred patients in HDU/UCI, but that’s 83% of the capacity, so there’s room for manoeuvre in the system.
Therefore, you do not believe that at this time, going through “speculative” and “disclosed” reports is the way forward.
We want to pay attention to the NHS colleagues who have capacity. There is no complacency, but he believes it is very vital for other people to keep things in perspective.
A for any of the Sunday Times.
How is the number of fines imposed compared to April?Law enforcement techniques the same way they did with national closure?
“We emit what we were,” he says.
But she says there’s a lot of confusion about what the restrictions are, which aren’t met.
Nor is there such a factor, especially among young people.
But you can see that it reaches the elderly.
“If we are going to have some kind of Christmas with the families, it is vital to get the message of fulfillment out now,” he said.
AB: We are about to intensify the application if they get the powers they discussed earlier, which would allow them to close more or less posts there.
About compliance: yes, there’s some fatigue, he says.
But it is repeated, especially with Halloween, the night of the bonfire: we are in a complicated position and can be seen in the FIGURES of the NHS.
There’s no doubt that the first line is increasing the pressure.
So we all have the public fitness tips.
No matter how we think some of those restrictions were, we’ll have to stick to the guidelines.
He asked if a national blockade “is the only way forward. “
And you think London will make up for our scenario and in the end it will be what will cause this?
When they had the opportunity to communicate with JVT about it, he says, they were told that a national technique would surely work, but that a regional technique might not be.
Given the option, he says, he would prefer a shorter and more accurate national intervention “rather than a winter at point three. “
That’s why I say I hope the government digs here.
People will already struggle due to lost revenue sources and will worry that their business will not survive.
This has human consequences.
“The government wants to be fair about our current situation,” he said.
Especially with regard to the NHS, if experts say one way is safe to take down business and that’s not it, what’s the guilty way to go?
January is historically the most complicated time of year for fitness service and we will have to do everything in our power to relieve that pressure.
You’re asking now.
It’s about ‘saving Christmas’.
He thinks that if we had an interruption of the national circuit “in the right direction at the right time,” he could allow families to better combine at Christmas.
There are arrangements that can be put in position “to give other people a Christmas form. “
The government wants to pay some attention to this rather than “digging” a regional strategy that says it won’t work.
A national intervention would give others hope for a better Christmas.
He says he knows a lot of other people are worried right now, adding the cash and his enjoyments.
There are other people who are worried about so many things.
He does not believe that a regional blocking formula provides the hope or certainty that other people need.
More decisive action is being taken in France, we cannot rule anything out, and the government does not.
Let’s move on to Bev Hughes.
More than 170 penalty notices were issued over the weekend.
Incidents similar to Covid have been reported “very high” – more than 500 – and more than 370 parties or meetings have been reported at home.
This shows a very high point of public concern, but also “unfortunately” a very high point of activity in terms of illegal meetings.
Some of them included a gigantic party at an Air BnB in the city centre, which saw a fine of 10,000 euros issued; a wedding with 30 other people in Hyde; a bar in the domain of the city center fined for serving after 10 p. m.
Police are very temporarily interfering to enforce, he said.
As a general rule, the police have returned to their general activity, with a very high call for domestic violence.
Police and firefighters are still looking for contacts at the door.
If the national traceability formula were higher, he says, and provided greater knowledge and faster, they may do even more.
Finally, he says they have been asking the government for some time to shut down the non-compliance facilities; it takes years, using existing legislation, to do so at this time.
They were told he would report to Parliament next week.
And here’s the “cause for concern”: hospital data.
The vast majority of arriving people will arrive as emergency patients and then be tested once there and diagnosed.
There’s “maybe a hospital Covid has acquired. “
There has also been a “significant increase” in the number of other people receiving intensive care with Covid, he said.
Represents 83. 2% of capacity.
This is not necessarily uncommon for this time of year, he says, what is unusual is that there is a “certain fact” that more people will be coming in the next few weeks.
It is also very much to say, he says, that the capacity is not constant and that they can be added more to the ICU and HDU.
Clearly, the trend is on the rise.
There are now 829 other people in general beds with Covid, compared to 173 just over a month earlier.
The evidence has continued to accumulate in all ten counties, he says, and now they’re level.
There is a “high positivity in all areas,” he adds.
And here’s the image of the nursing home. This has been constant over the summer, but is now increasing.
This is a “concern,” he says, it is vital to compare this earlier this year with cases in retirement homes.
Although the only comparable figure in early May – due to the delay in testing at that time – at that time the figure 6. 7%. The peak had been in April.
So that’s the comparison.
Here are some new data: a comparison with growing regions.
We’re “a little taller” than the English average, he says. We are now beginning to see higher rates of expansion in the Midlands and southern England.
Andy Burnham opens the press conference.
Today, it’s in two halves: the first component will be in the pandemic, he says, and then in the GMSF. They will answer questions about Covid before moving on to the area frame.
It’s with the latest data. It’s a “difficult image” in GM, he says.
Here are the latest rates. There’s a little more optimism in the October 25 figures, he says they’re still worrying.
Hello and welcome to the press convention in Greater Manchester, which now, for me, begins to look like you are on a continuous cycle.
Today he replaces the mayor’s on Wednesday and will provide knowledge about the physical state of the pandemic, adding hospital figures, infection rates, nursing home epidemics and perhaps more context about how the formula as a whole is handling it.
The presence of his deputy Bev Hughes suggests we probably have an update on the effect of the police as well.
In the middle of the moment, we will be treated with a full consultation on the framework of Greater Manchester, one of my unwanted brain subjects.
So it will be a longer-than-usual press convention, but it will probably cover a little soil accordingly.