Liverpool fans rejoiced to see their Reds win the Carabao Cup against all odds, a triumph made all the sweeter by Will Ford’s nausea. . .
Let us know what you theeditor@football365. com. . .
First, the facts. Chelsea also had a young team on the pitch. This team “bought” by choice. And yes, they’ve spent over a billion pounds on them (and risking the team’s monetary future). Whereas Liverpool are basically due to injuries.
It’s worth noting that Chelsea’s 11 starts were a combined 258 years old and an average age of 23. 46. The squad count added up to 192, while Liverpool started with an average of 257 or 23. 36 and blouse numbers of 276. Why jersey numbers? This gives you an idea of where the club is considering players in this season’s plans. A lower number means a higher probability of betting a role. Hell, some players even had the “team” (McConnell and Danns).
Chelsea finished with 250 or 22. 7 on average, while Liverpool finished with 238 or an average of 21. 36 and blouse numbers of 404.
So even though the starting 11 were the same age, the final 11 were drastically different. And let’s face it, Mudryk and Nkunku would even be considered players destined to play football in Chelsea’s first team, the top experts expected something wonderful. Nkunku stuff.
Second, the reason. Obviously, the difference is in the way Klopp instills a risk-taking mentality within the team. Yes, it makes them use a formula that allows them to play higher, but they still have to accept it as true to their peers, stick together. helping each other, which rarely fails but also brings wonderful rewards when they do it right. The fact that ‘kids’ play this way in training, when asked to sign up for the first team in training, means that they don’t feel intimidated or out of position when asked. They have progressed through the old teams by doing this. They can come in and do a job. It’s not as transparent or as fluid, but it’s enough to retain less ambitious teams.
And that sums up Chelsea today. In combination, like many paintings bought at a flea market, well, maybe not a “sale” but an expensive auction. They are not bought to be compatible with a system, they do not play in a cohesive system, they do not perceive others. They do not paint in combination transparently. They play for a coach who does not give them the same intensity, the hugs, the trust.
Not only did the “kids” regain their intensity in extra time, but they played relatively consistently. Meanwhile, Chelsea’s adjustments were very similar, maybe a little quicker, waiting for a break, to use their rhythm, but without a plan. a ‘bottle job’ at Chelsea, they just weren’t trained differently. Of course, a player might say: let’s be more aggressive, let’s take more risks, but the “people” have to work together to pay off. Liverpool were willing to take risks, go through it, accept it as truth with the system, and the manager accept it as truth with them. A lot of tension but at the same time no tension. They’ve done it before, they play that way this week. in and out of the week.
Read more: Chelsea 0-1 Liverpool takeaways: Van Dijk’s greatness, the kids, the injuries, the underdogs and. . . Carabao BEER?
. . . Well, it was a little embarrassing. A teenage organization with so little delight in that 20-year-old Bradley, with five senior appearances, was one of the most delightful players we had on the field. There was a time when our third-choice right-back was forced to move into midfield and was replaced by a 19-year-old and Chelsea were still struggling to put their finger on us.
I looked at this combined article from the XI you wrote in the morning and thought it was silly at the time. It’s almost ridiculous right now. The only player in blue to leave with credits was Gallagher and, interestingly, it looks like he will be out this summer. The £1 billion Frankenstein team that Chelsea have built on the basis of long-term prices and eight-year contracts are worse than a Liverpool 3rd XI team with nine players under the age of 25 who come from Liverpool’s academy and are paid nothing.
This is also the basic challenge Chelsea are facing at the moment; They have a team of players under contract until the end of their careers. What’s the incentive to do something? There’s no need to worry about being sold if they underperform, as their contracts are so lucrative that they’ll get paid gloriously if that happens. Their contracts are also so long that no one else can afford the contracts to buy them in first position and there is no threat if they underperform. Jordan Ibe used to play for Liverpool and now plays for Ebbsfleet Town. That’s the threat you run when you underperform at any other club in European football. If Caceido plays like this for the next 7 1/2 years, he may end up on loan at Ebbsfleet even with his attractive salary at Chelsea. We’ve all noticed footballers playing for their lives to get a new contract so that at least Chelsea enthusiasts can look ahead to 2031, when so much dross may just start to show up every week.
What’s wrong with Chelsea fans? Those next to me spent the whole game berating their own players and it’s not easy for the most unlikely (“SHOOT” when the guy is surrounded by 3 definers or “PASS” when he has no options). If that’s what Stamford Bridge looks like, it’s no wonder this team looks so toxic. They were also thrilled to see this horror challenge from Caceido to Gravenberch. I don’t think there’s any malice in that, though, in the end, the guy got his winner’s medal with crutches and a protective boot.
How poor is the public in refereeing this setback when VVD’s first goal is disallowed? Essentially, the argument is that Endo is blocking space, but Endo has no duty not to defend himself. Unless we say that football is not a touch sport, it has the right to stay where it is. Colwil may have been lapped, but he decided to go neck and neck and came in second. The referee and VAR also make ridiculous predictions about Colwil’s long-term trajectory, imagining that he would surely have ended up where the ball landed. His task was probably to mark Endo and there is no certainty that Endo moved towards the ball. As a midfielder, his task (as was the entire game) was probably to set up on the edge of the box to recycle ownership if he returned. This means that there is a chance that Colwil thought Endo was passing the ball and was so complex towards him, but collided with Endo, who never planned to go out to enter from the subject. If Colwil does not meet Endo, there is no certainty that Colwil will continue trying to attack the ball and you cannot disallow a goal based on your intuition of what you think might have happened. It would be different if Endo had blocked Chilwell, who by the way was the guy marking VVD, so I can totally understand him not giving it away. It was a joke and Kavangh saw it so many times because he clearly can’t find a reason to reject her. He deserved to have had the strength and quality to dominate the VAR, but at that moment he was too scared to know what to do. After watching referee John Brooks’ (VAR Today) football matches, it is quite clear that he is absolutely incompetent, so how those two were given the green light for a great example in football, indeed, surpasses me.
VAR controlled to deny Liverpool a straight win, but it must be remembered that elegance remains permanent.
It’s one of the sweetest wins I’ve ever tasted!
In addition, Endo and Mcallister showed that one hundred minutes are worth it for Caicedo and Enzo. They must have sucked.
Read more: Klopp and Liverpool unduly beat Carabao from a trio of underdog Sky Sports street vendors
. . . Will Ford’s bitter article, which frankly deserved to have been published in a Chelsea fanzine and not on a conventional football site, greatly increased my satisfaction with today’s result.
. . . Guys, we know you want to sell ad space. And know that LFC enthusiasts will bite like a Rottweiler on the roof of an ’80s pub. But touting it as the 11th Chelsea vs. Top Of The Table Liverpool doesn’t say the total. history, and you know it.
Without our first team goalkeeper, RB, BC, 87 midfielders, wasting the odd and playing a 20-year-old right-back as a striker, and our entire front line, part of our under-21 team, AND WINING is ridiculous.
I clicked on my favourite football site (unless I surely hate it) and guess what, there was an article that suggested, as I actually just skimmed through it, that just because Chelsea are and are miles behind Liverpool in the league, it deserves to do so. Actually, you wouldn’t expect them to beat a team of kids and reserve players.
The team that finished (and won) the match for Liverpool had 2 players who are maybe all 11. Two more sensible!
Anyway, it briefly bothered me, until I balanced myself with a bit of smoke and found that it was basically throwing red meat in the first place. I get it, I’ll click on an article if it throws some negativity on, say, Manchester City’s good luck or a brief ray of light on United’s luck.
. . . I’m very proud of Liverpool today. Will Ford does his thing to calm morale, but no one buys him
Liverpool were clearly a loser today. Yes, they faced young players in the final.
The team that has a 25-point lead over Chelsea today did not play combined, Will said.
Danns, Bradley, Clarke, Kelleher, McDonnell. How many departures will it have?
So yes, they were the underdogs. And my God, other people like you will complain about Klopp’s nauseating farewell excursion will only make it sweeter.
Get a good night’s sleep in your United pyjamas, don’t let Ten Haag give you nightmares
But: Peter Drury (who, by the way, couldn’t have been more flowery if he’d fallen into a tub of Aqua Di Parma)
“Football is all about money!!”
Virgil Van Dijk’s move: £75 million.
Stop making us think that they are different.
Read more: Super Sunday drowned in Peter Drury’s script and horror maelstrom
Kellaher is exceptional. He is by far the most productive No. 2 in the league and deserves to be the first pick of a “big” club next season. I’d have him at Chelsea in the blink of an eye, but he’s too smart for an average to be able to play a poor mid-table team.
Chelsea players, of course, are ashamed of themselves. The most productive chance this players’ organisation will ever have to win a trophy, given Liverpool’s exhaustion.
What stands out most among the many things Chelsea are bad at is their inability to retain the ball. No more than 3 passes and they would lose it. None of the players, especially the midfielder, can take on cleanly (or not at all), which exacerbates ball retention, as a clumsy challenge will result in a foul or the ball being returned to the opponent. Often, Chelsea would win a match free kick, but lose the ball before the replay of the foul ends.
Chelsea are notorious for their poor finishing, but in extra time it almost looked like they didn’t even need to score and maybe just waited for penalties. Fuck, you know why, because they would have lost even if the game had.
If blue cards are the new rule we deserve as a result of VAR, then the new rule we want would be the Liverpool-Chelsea Cup final. When they got to extra time, I was only interested in Klopp’s young back-to-back replacements, but it seemed as if they were right to take – phew – the consequences. I don’t think there’s anything worse than the consequences for a neutral. You’ve just seen 90 minutes of deadlock, then part of an hour of nervous, angry shyness, and in the end, it all comes down to what feels like flipping a coin.
Obviously, Liverpool and Chelsea cancel each other out, so let’s not do that anymore. Now, when Liverpool and Chelsea meet in a one-legged cup final or semi-final, let’s skip regulation time, ask the three benches of each. The eight most sensible healthy players on a team to simulate regulation substitutions and start with extra time. We have part of an hour of football full of life but tense with groups more prone to making mistakes in 3 positions. Sounds fun. It probably will end in penalties, but it probably wouldn’t have lost that much on Sunday.
Hojiland’s absence before the game was a blow, but gambling with such inconsistency in the final third without a single player and someone who is only 21 years old, showed that United had little to no quality from the start. I mean, even in midfield, would you think that a midfield made up of Casemiro, Mainoo and Fernandes would have enough quality to at least get a result?Well, no, because unfortunately Fernandes cries more than a top-level schoolgirl who has just been abandoned, well, Casemiro couldn’t even win with a header. unlike Reed, which is part of his size, and I’m glad he left after that fight because he’s not. He’s not even the player he was last year, he looks so unfit.
Oh, and as for Ten Haag, it’s clear that he’s not a bad coach, but he’s not a wonderful coach either. He tries to play against teenagers with experienced players and I think that’s the right combination and balance that you want in a team, however, you don’t get the most out of the experienced players at all. I don’t think he has the personality to make the player consistent, and I don’t think experienced players like Varane, Maguire and Casemiro probably care what he says. At the time and tactically I’ve never noticed him replacing things. Part-time or in a game, he sits on the sidelines, hands in fucking pockets, for the entire game.
5 things to write down after this season and yesterday’s game:
8 defeats in all competitions this season at home after being almost unbeaten last season. Not only worrisome, but also very mediocre and the season is rarely over yet. This is mainly due to Ten Haag, but also to a few key players.
If Maguire is the club’s most productive centre-back, doesn’t that say it all in terms of recruitment?He’s a smart pro player and he’s doing as productive as possible, but his most productive level isn’t anywhere near enough for a consistent Top 3-4. I’d stay that way, but, for God’s sake, I’d point out to one of the two CBs that they have glass, that they’re smart age, that they really know how to fend for themselves, and that they’re in good shape. Surely it’s not that hard to do!
Rashford is not expected to go through to the Euros the way he has played this season, which is sometimes an embarrassment for a player. His movement is pitiful and he can’t even pass a ball five yards out. Oh, and if he doesn’t even score 10 passes. This year, I would sell him to PSG now that Mbappe is out. Rashford doesn’t mind signing the new contract, but he believes it’s bigger than it really is because of his arrogance, so it happens to have good compatibility. at PSG and will probably get £50 million to £60 million for him.
Why did United single out Mount? Honestly, what he’s presented since he arrived, obviously he just signed with the club for money and glory, took the number 7 blouse and almost sits on his butt. How can we spend £50 million on an England midfielder without even getting a loan?a hand from him?
With the new co-ownership and Ratcliffe reportedly cares a bit about how the club deserves to be managed, it’s a case where he or someone under his command passes the manager and brings up the concept of selling them or listing them. list. It has to take place with at least five other players this summer, no more excuses, players can’t be trusted, but I would also include the manager on that list when I regroup this summer. If United end up wasting more than thirteen league games this season, do they really deserve a chance for a third season in the job?I don’t think so and it’s not worth trusting, and I don’t see United winning the FA Cup this season, so I think he deserves to pack his bags and go back to Ajax.
. . . Honestly, I’m sure we’ve passed those truth checks, but I guess that’s another one.
ETH could end up being a fraud, but that’s not the main explanation for why this equipment looks so bad. This team has been terrible for years, but their fans have continued to claim that Bruno and his ilk are legitimate, high-profile players. , recording atrocious signings and overreacting to some incredibly disappointing moments. If you’re sitting here mourning the loss of players like Luke Shaw and Casemiro, you’re honestly a lost cause. You’re not on the rise, you’re not even in rebuild mode. This team is rotten from start to finish, and you tried to skip the “smash it all” phase, pre-terminating that this team had a forged core to build on.
Surely this is not the case. Bruno Kevin, Garnacho embodies Ronaldo, and closing the gaps with Eriksen and Amrabat is hilarious and irresponsible. At this point, honestly, you don’t have a single player worthy of a top-four team, and winning five terrible games 1-0 doesn’t do that. He doesn’t replace it, he just masks it for a month before rinsing it off and repeating his tantrum. There is no crisis, the horse ran away and died years ago. Start over. With or without ETH, you’re at least four years and twenty players away from being respectable.
You make a clever comment about the fact that some clubs have monetary conspiracy armor, it’s going to have to be frustrating for fans who are further down the pyramid to hear court cases from some fan bases, the disorders are relative.
At the end of the day, I’m not too keen on Ratcliffe, I’ve been injured before, but having a key member of the city organisation as CEO and a probably highly rated DOF Ashworth turns out to be a smart start and it’s great to be able to at least hear about football for a change.