Release date: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 9:30 a. m.
Arsenal have won two games, but the mailbox still believes Mikel Arteta is good. Send your feedback on this and more to theeditor@football365. com
After the win against Chelsea, he said the recent performances were clever and that only luck and effects opposed us. After the 0–1 win over Brighton, it took about five seconds to tell the interviewer ‘the effects, not the performances’ when talking about Arsenal’s difficulties. Turns out there’s some kind of intellectual blockade when it comes to being fair to this season’s performances or maybe (and more concern) it was given to his eyes and thinks the performances have been clever.
In addition to those illusions about performance, you have the probability percentage that we would have beaten the opposition based on knowledge and my non-public favorite that, of course, the ”pure mathematics” when we crossed the ball 44 times against the Spurs, resulting in 0 goals. So what exactly is this “pure mathematics”?50 centers 1 goal?So, to win a game 2-0, would we cross the ball a hundred times?
What made Arsenal so special for so long?That’s his football brand. For more years than I’d like to admit, Arsenal have played the ultimate squizzly taste of football in the league.
Now look at them. You have no idea when the next and less objective part can arrive, even his 3-1 win over Chelsea is not seen as a turning point, his 3 goals do not resemble the kind of lenses that can be played very often (a penalty, a direct loose shot and a flukey centre that even the striker will have been surprised to see flying).
The worst component is that one of your paid players brazenly holds the key to opening the center of this problem.
How can Mesut Ozil be excluded from this Arsenal in such quality?
Arteta sold her most productive goalkeeper (Martinez), froze the most productive game creator, failed to make them difficult to score and left them helpless. If that’s not enough, it’s in the press and starts walking on statistics: goals possibly expected!
The Premier League aims to be a premium product with elite players, courts, coaches, etc. Arteta doesn’t get involved.
When I read last year that Werner would be a wonderful buy for Liverpool: being able to play in any position on the front line, I saw him play and I knew it was only harmful when he was running towards defences from a central or out-of-centre position – regularly on a getaway. This did not correspond to a possession-oriented team and would not paint as an “extreme”. So satisfied that Liverpool bought Jota instead, which best suited the team.
For me, Chelsea were doing their thing by buying a lot of smart players but without a plan to know where they would play. Last year, Chelsea were more balanced, even with their poor defensive setup, compared to this year. to Lampard’s mismanagement.
Other writers who have complained that OGS receives a lot of criticism, while Lampard (and Arteta) seemed to get away with it without problems have a point, while we are more fickle in those days, with constant exposure to football and jumping on a team after a win. or a defeat, Lampard has never been inspired by the Derby and has the same challenge of looking to build a team that can score without running like a strainer. Clearly more complicated than it looks – and partly the tension to run a “bigger” club where expectations are high. However, we are there and nothing turns out to have replaced in that regard.
Einstein had a reputation for saying he did the same thing, but expecting another result to be a sign of madness.
The purpose of this email, however, was to review Allardyce’s relevance in a higher respect. I saw that TFF identified that Allardyce’s character made him un appealing to larger groups, while maintaining his skill would have made him a success. perception that led me to write. There are some features that more productive clubs tend to look for in a coach; a defined hot game flavor, a story of cutlery, background in the progression of the player and the prankster of a success story with the club. I think few other people can simply defend Allardyce for any of those reasons; has not recorded a positive objective difference since 2006 and I would say it is shaping players to fit their formula rather than them as players.
Beyond the absence of those positive aspects, there is a lot of luggage that Allardyce has brought with him. Allegations of undue bills of his son following Panorama’s investigation in 2006, the same year of the Calciopoli Scandal in Serie A, would have frightened many In addition, he has very fine skin, as evidenced by his relationship with Newcastle, West Ham and Everton enthusiasts. Needless to say, he was able to fight Premier League club enthusiasts historically in the middle. of the table that would fight at the highlight in Old Trafford or the Emirates during a difficult period. If we have to look further, I doubt that Real Madrid and Inter Milan (for whom he said he was adapted) even knew who he was. , not to mention a technician with a career as a banal player, 0 trophy and no tongue at the moment.
. . . Then. . . Sam Allardyce, for starters?
Send your team to Anfield, all players play well for West Brom, effort, commitment, passion.
Then. . . Wait, play at home with some other promoted team and cheer up. Where commitment, passion, effort?
The biggest challenge facing a champion team, the others suddenly and then crumbling. I don’t blame the players, it’s natural.
But I blame Sam Allardyce, interview after a pool game with a big radio.
He congratulated him, the firefighter Sam, who loved, motivating, tactically cunning. Nan. Ne t. A. everybody.
Yes, I’m bitter, I’ll sleep a lot more tonight knowing that Sam Allardyce has had his arrogant air taken away.
. . . Your last mailbox with the courageous headline: “Only Joseph, Klopp and Guardiola are bigger than Big Sam. . . “
In the not-so-distant days, there was more or less Gary Neville to decide. The other option that English managers had at their disposal to their younger, poorer brother, Phil.
However, the list of existing right-handed sides to play for the Three Lions is likely to be endless. 11 (!) First obvious possible options say the following:
In addition to this impressive harvest, there are also several other flexible players who can simply paint smoothly on the right side, even if they prefer other positions. Ainsley Maitland Niles, Arsenal’s application man, comes to mind. The same goes for Ashley (forever) Young of Inter Milan, Tosin Adarabioyo of Fulham, Alex Tuanzebe of Manchester United and Chris Smalling of Rome.
Other less favorable features are Still Luke Ayling of Leeds, George Baldock of Sheff Utd, Darnell Furlong of West Brom, Matthew Lowton of Burnley, Max Kilman of Wolves, Martin Kelly of Crystal Palace, Adam Smith of Bournemouth, Jonjoe Kenny of Everton, Jeremy Ngakia of Watford and even the forgotten man, Phil Jones of Manchester United.
Stuart Atwell ran around assigning fouls without even worrying. Incredibly, it was Chelsea who had the top players in Villa falling to the ground with the slightest inferred contact. That brings me to Grealish, someone had a statistic that he is the maximum in short, he is a very good player, but he does not receive fouls like a Hazard, his statistics increase through his continuous acquisition of loose shots. Spend 3/4 of your game in the air and the other 1/4 on the floor!Atwell gave Christensen the credit for missing him last night. Experts have claimed it was a 50/50 collision, but replays obviously show Grealish throwing a leg to check and start contact. It’s this attempt that obviously hurts Christensen.
Some Newcastle enthusiasts are quite satisfied with an unreliable human rights take-in, as long as they can get rid of Ashley, but I think marking the club’s name/kit/stadium would be a step too far for their rich history (Sports Direct Arena, FFS). )
But everyone has a story (yes, even the MK Dons. . . in a way: Austria Salzburg was already one of the most productive Austrian clubs before its acquisition. I wouldn’t need my Cheltenham Town for the Red Bull Robins, even if it meant taking advantage of wealthy prospects and taking us, say, to the championship or beyond with the big ones, but maybe others would agree with that.
Would anyone be willing to do that? Gao needs to sell Southampton and Hasenh-ttl has already worked with RB. If you first have dibs about players like Sabitzer, Szoboszlai and Upamecano, I can see the meaning. RB essentially took over a fifth-tier club to make Leipzig, so even Stevenage can believe in his chances now.
Refresh your browser to view this website. Update my browser now
×