Release date: Sunday, September 6, 2020 10:01 a.m.
Thank you for your glorious emails. Send your mind to [email protected]
Although I see the point, I think it lacks much more.Liverpool is more than a collection of wonderful players.They’re more than a team. From the back up as a club, they are years away from the Man U: infrastructure, movement policy, ethics …
I see a lot of other people referring to a big trouble hole recommending that one team is particularly better or worse than the other. Ted, Manchester for example, in the mailbox on Friday afternoon highlighted 33 problems between United and Liverpool. This letter is not intended to give an opinion on whether Gary Neill was right in saying that United will skip Liverpool (they did not), I will communicate on the 18th between Liverpool and City.
It’s a lot, a very comfortable victory, but it doesn’t have a direct correlation with its quality.
The city was right in many tactics last season, a massive and slack advantage in scored goals and not much worse goals conceded, in fact able to beat Liverpool that day (the opposite is also true). However, they had espresso problems.Once they gave up, they struggled to lift their heads and change things when Liverpool was a machine, winning by small margins.They were the most productive side … but not right now.
The City corrects its comfortable spinal disorders (what it seems to be doing), or Liverpool stop a little, which can lead to a big change.
My point is that very fine margins can lead to giant fluctuations.A small setting that allows you to grant five less purposes can turn five games you would have drawn in a season into a singles purpose and score 10 points.
In my opinion, City was shooting just below a line and Liverpool just above, but that can lead to an exponential replacement in the accumulated problems.
As a metaphor. If the point of functionality of any of the groups is an infectious disease – City had a breeding number, or “r” of 0.9 – much and one to take seriously, however, a draw of flat or even decreasing points.Liverpool had an “r” of 1.1. A small margin but accumulating exponentially more points.One or the other can gently replace a bit of one shape or another and the trend is reversed.
When I read the mailbox on Friday, I discovered that it was reassuring that after such a debatable letter from William, Leicester, there would be well-written, articulated and balanced answers on both sides of the camp.organization of followers What I would say is that if you don’t like an article, don’t read it …However, I also believe that other people have the right to write and demonstrate their dissatisfaction on the particular site/article/writer. Freedom of speech and everything, fair play on F365 for publication on both sides.
Anyway, I’m going to talk about Mikey, CFC, who lit a chimney that I feel in the mailbox with a crunchy question.
– The EPPP is there as an industry for the solidarity bills granted through the PLA.EFL clubs know that the EPL doesn’t get those players on the loose and, more importantly, those tickets.Payments are also reliable and robust, which means yes.You don’t need to plan to get a smart player out of the academy to get it.EFL can seamlessly terminate the fix, but it’s not, because it’s advantageous to them because it’s less difficult to plan when you have solid, predictable income.
Would a direct exchange agreement for free agents be fairer?In fact, yes, and I think it would be better to praise the progression of smart players for England, but the EFL did need it before COVID and they will be even worse off leaving the EPPP after COVID, and as collective members, they deserve to be blamed and fair EPL.
– Frankly, the PLA doesn’t have to worry about distributing wealth in the lower leagues, and I wouldn’t have to either.I mean, the EFL is rarely very enthusiastic, since Championship gets 80% of the cash from EFL TV.all 3 divisions. Each league, adding the EFL, handles yours.
– Not sure what thirteen foreign EPL owners have to do with anything?The PLA has long been a global league and readers like me and many others in all nations reflect this globalism.for us more, are we international?You can be bigger than that. Not that foreign clubs are the only ones with non-English players.
Only in William’s ridiculously assumed and incredibly erroneous email would I like to address the observation that “No one really supports a specific club because of its policy.”FC St Pauli would recommend otherwise. William probably wouldn’t like it.When other people complain about the presence of politics, they feel they are really upset about the presence of bad policy.For those other people, there’s Chelsea.
Al, the apolitical admirer of the LFC, was the real shock, it’s like saying you don’t care about the gun if you get shot in the chicken and then you get prosecuted for stealing the bullet.
Well, it turns out there are at least some readers of this site who like politics in football because that’s their politics, but it wasn’t a surprise.
I can’t make other people stupid enough to think that when I say that politics has no place in football, I mean the politics involved in bureaucratic football governance. This policy is not very attractive in most cases but it has its position. in soccer (and in soccer journalism) or the capitalist monster that soccer is in fashion would not exist at all. It’s just a bunch of fancy dress in convention halls, so not the ideological politics that has no place in football that shoves our throats. communicate about the governance of football what they want, but I don’t think it will be of interest to so many people unless it is some other FIFA scandal.
This wants to be emphasized. Marcus Rashford’s crusade was not “political,” others did.Rashford never did “political, ” he didn’t even seem to need to do interviews about it or get applause at all, which I think was great.He was just using his fame to do anything he could think of was morally correct.Wanting young people to have food isn’t a right-wing or left-wing thing, it’s just the right thing to do.The fact that the government had to worry about its crusade succeeding was the only thing Political detail about this, there was no party or ideological line drawn so little “political” in the sense that we are talking here.
Let’s answer that because obviously others have drawn the political lines on the mailbox that I was seeking to avoid. The politics that lately has taken hold of soccer and soccer journalism is cultural Marxism, an ideology that, among other things, seeks to divide everyone on racial grounds. , on the grounds of gender and sexual orientation By expressing your disagreement, you can be banned from social media even if you have not damaged any of the CGUs, lost your assignment, or even been questioned by the police for something other than a crime in This country Soccer has long tried to fight racism and homophobia in sport, so why would it invite a genealogy that only needs to turn discrimination on other teams instead of solving it? How does something like this have a position in football? Why does anyone deserve to be part of a soccer team without accusing me of being a rightist or racist? I do not think so.
Imagine if a footballer came out and said he voted for conservatives, enjoyed Donald Trump, called for stricter immigration laws, or a club refused to allow a politician to update the names of players on his shirts for any reason.and then probably forced to make some kind of apology because their careers may have ended or the club would be called “ista” (or “phobic”) if that were not the case.This occasion never happened exactly because of the effects that No contrary vision is allowed at the moment, just bend the knee or face the consequences, no club or player has the courage to do it otherwise at this time.
Refresh your browser to view this website. Update my browser now
×