Manchester Arena investigation: the guard did not sound the alarm about the terrorist because he was afraid of being labeled racist

A security guard who led the night of the Manchester Arena attack told the investigation that he did not sound the alarm about Salman Abedi because he feared being “called a racist. “

Kyle Lawler, then an 18-year-old butler, said he had been trained in what he should consider, but that he was “naive” about the option of a terrorist incident and the idea that it would “not happen to me. “

He did not alert his room to the Abedi bomber, which was hiding in a domain at the back of the city corridor lobby, after being informed of Abedi six minutes before the explosion.

It is the last chance to prevent the audience of Ariana Grande’s concert from leaving the arena before the May 2017 explosion, which killed 22 people.

Lawler said in the investigation that Abedi was sitting among a “group of white people” and described his behavior as “a little nervous. “

I had a “bad feeling” about him and that he “had no place”.

Lawler’s former was read as part of the investigation, which read, “I was afraid of being wrong and being called “racist”; if I had made a mistake, I would have had problems. It made me doubt what to do, overreact or judge someone founded on their race. “

Mr. Lawler agreed that this is the explanation for why he had not issued an alert about Abedi without delay.

He also told the investigation that he had tried to call his bosses on the radio but that it could happen.

Paul Greaney, quality control of the investigation, asked, “When you went to work, did you know you had to be alert to the threat of a terrorist attack?”

Lawler said, “I think I was pretty naive at the time, one of those things where, yes, it was a possibility, but it probably wouldn’t happen to me.

“You see it on the news and it’s not on your door yet. “

Lawler said he worked for Showsec, the arena security contractors, since he left at age 16, earning 4. 24 euros an hour, but had never had to deal with a suspicious user before tonight.

He had heard reports that the risk of a terrorist attack was “serious,” meaning that an attack was “very likely,” adding: wisdom of what this meant.

Mr. Lawler had terminated his agreement with the security industry four months before the attack and had a radio.

“I didn’t actively seek more responsibility, but Showsec knew he was willing to do more,” he said in the investigation.

Mr. Lawler admitted that he had been trained in how to stumble upon the behavior presented through Abedi.

A video entitled Eyes Wide Open was released, telling curators what to monitor and highlighting the risk to concert halls.

It included a case where a suspect would come in, go out and hang out in a place during a prolonged era.

Mr Greaney asked, “Those things you had in your brain to watch when you were a butler?”

Mr. Lawler replied, “Yes, first make your comments, look for behavior, if you are in your place. “

He added that he had to tell his people that he would read about the suspect and “if you go by check, they will essentially tell you what they think and advise you on the next step. “

Mr Greaney asked, “Did you know the kind of things to consider?”

Lawler replied, “Yes. “

The research found that the video read: “Know what general behavior looks like. What excuses can you give him, what questions can he ask? Know your reporting procedures. “

A police officer adds: “It can be awkward for any of you to manipulate someone and ask them about their behavior.

“If clear, calm and polite, the maximum number of members of the public will be sympathetic. You and your colleagues will be on the lookout to deter a terrorist. “

Lawler told the research: “Personally, I think human relationship skills, you have to deal with other people to gain that experience. I don’t think an online classroom or module can teach you how to communicate with other people. “

Before beginning his testimony, a statement was read in the investigation in which Mr. Lawler said: “I discovered that it was very difficult to obviously realize what happened, to get to the bottom of what I saw and then come up with what I know now with the merit of hindsight in cases where everything happened quickly. “

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *