Release date: Friday, August 7, 2020 12:02 p.m.
Manchester United deserves to be happy to give Alexis Sanchez nine million pounds instead of around 50 million pounds. Poor lawn.
The sun is an example on Friday.
– Football365 (F365) 7 August 2020
Francis Cagigao was “very publicized”. So much so that he called him Arsenal’s “best scout” in a report he was compromised on Thursday. And some other people have heard of Brian McDermott and Peter Clark.
But the “victim” is a point of friction here. It can never be the right term for a footballer worth 30 million pounds who is guaranteed a task elsewhere, especially at the beginning of a sentence that ends with 55 other people from the same company who will lose their tasks. That’s right.
Ainsley Maitland-Niles is a “victim” only in the football sense of the term, where players are “rejected” or “sacrificed” every year. In genuine terms, being forced to join another Premier League team with a fake salary in search of a normal playing time is so far from a “victim” that when talking at the same time as layoffs. That’s a small point, but valid.
He is a player who has one of the last five Premier League games of the club and finished the season with fewer appearances in all competitions than Matteo Guendouzi. Arsenal’s ‘ultimate FA Cup hero’ (his two goals were a special moment) is not a guaranteed starter sold for five million pounds.
No, Arsenal has made the decision to convert a valuable but non-indispensable player with a decent term of their contract that remains “available for transfer” at 30 million pounds. They are “open for sale” at a time of apparent monetary difficulties, without letting you through anything.
Of course, this will have to look more “strange” if the potentially sold player has recently granted you a full interview and needs to put it aside. That makes sense.
“You can tell everyone that footballers are simply movie stars, who pay billions in taxes, that raise a nation’s morale.
“You can communicate about existing rates, TV offers.
“And I would be right if I pointed out that football clubs and players seem to have a greater ethical duty than other large corporations and large incomes.
“But the main thing is the monetary figures, the wages and the moving fees, jar. Not good.
“A Manchester United player feels compelled to raise cash to feed the poor young people in those difficult times; a long-term Manchester United player is most likely about to collect a hundred million pounds and earn more than 200,000 pounds a week.”
A reminder that the “current Manchester United player” earns 250,000 euros a week and says that “Manchester United’s long-term player” is no stranger to charity.
This is an article just in a different way that highlights many fair points. But having Marcus Rashford as a smart referee in those difficult times and employing Jadon Sancho as an example of football’s frivolous finance is a little strange when he says he wins the former and will probably win even more than in the moment after this summer. Not that it matters.
“It is an idea that United loved his paintings with Sanchez, who would have earned about 50 million pounds with the rest of his contract – which he had almost two years to run” – the Sun’s fourth paragraph.
Unless you’re talking about the 41 million pounds stored through Manchester United, that’s not the right term for Alexis Sanchez’s only successful resolution.
REVEALED: Alexis Sanchez has raised nine million pounds from Manchester United to secure his departure to the Inter Milan Array… however, the club is still happy with the result after erasing the salary of 560,000 euros consistent with the week of ‘record failure’
LATEST NEWS: The club is “always happy” to have controlled to save up to a million pounds. What’s next?
“Manchester United can have a new left winger”
It’s our attention, Manchester Evening News. Is that Jack Grealish? Maybe Diogo Jota? The two linked. Dwight McNeil? Oh, tell us …
No, no, and still. It’s Jesse, you Lingard. Twenty-eight this year, Jesse Lingard. Free to go, Jesse Lingard. Manchester. Kingdom. Could. Have. A. New. The left. The end. Jesse. Lingard.
Sir.
He is the same player who has twice on Manchester United’s left wing this season, in the FA Cup against Derby and Norwich. The same player who last scored as a left-back in December 2018. The same player who last scored as a left-back in January 2018.
This is the same player Samuel Luckhurst wrote in June:
“The guy who couldn’t do any harm couldn’t do anything smart in Norwich, where Bruno Fernandes brought back to the tip of Jesse Lingard and Juan Mata.”
And, better yet, this in May:
“Lingard has just started cup matches at Club Brugge and Derby County, some of the symptoms of a player’s prestige, and cannot be found in Linz. No one asked why.”
From a “little fry” whose absence remained undisteered three months ago, someone who returned Bruno Fernandes to his starting point two months ago, to a reserve option imaginable in a position where he once played a little, let alone excellence.
All because he did well for about 50 minutes left in front of the fourth team from Austria. Oh seriously?
With this “huge amount” being significantly less than the remaining salary that corresponded to his contract. It’s not “amazing” or pretending that Manchester United is “always happy,” to be fair.
Update your browser to view this website. Update my browser now
×