Release date: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 9:39 a. m.
Send your on Manchester United to theeditor@football365. com.
I miss reading moan U enthusiasts complaining about their club because other wealthy people have paid the value required to buy an asset for profit purposes. Why is anyone surprised or disappointed now that those other wealthy people need benefits first, then trophies?like you’re alone in this area. For something similar, check out my own Arsenal club, or even chat with a Blackpool fan. Give him a break. You spend a lot of cash on new managers and players as normal.
In short, I sought to learn about Arsenal’s moving business. Turns out it is commonly accepted that we just had a very clever move-in window. I don’t need to be a grouse or a rain on the catwalks, but I looked to ask myself if that’s the case Stay with me . . .
First of all, the biggest thing . . . We lost Gunnersaurus, It would be better to have a buy option or something, otherwise there will be murders.
Then on the nets, isn’t anyone else convinced we sold the right doorman according to?!Perhaps I am a supporter of Martinez’s moving history, who has been with us for so long and then won the FA Cup. However, I think he’s bigger than Leno with the ball on his feet. The defense seemed more arranged with him behind him. When McGoldrick’s left foot passed the tip of Leno’s fingers last weekend, I also found myself thinking, “I bet Martinez’s extra height would have noticed. “, to me, he’s the most sensible goal scorer. In addition, we got a few million for a “second choice” GK. Not bad. They probably would probably only have given us 40-50 m for a ‘first choice’ (in Chelsea?) And let’s not lose the functionality consistent with it. You know what he would have bought us: Aouar, and we all know that an Aouar Partey would. be monstrous. And make headlines.
In the back. Very pleased to have kept AMN, I think they have given him a lot of talent. Gabriel is still unreasonable and forged so far. Bellerin doesn’t look (yet) like the player she had before the injuries, so it remains to be noticed if not sending him to Barca is a blessing or a curse.
However, we are now similar to Man U in the sense that we have a massive collection of CB, some of which will not reproduce. For 3 positions of CB we have (deep breathing): Luiz, Gabriel, Holding, Mari, Mustafi, Tierney, Kolasinac, Chambers, Sokratis, Saliba. That’s ten players. We have had extraordinary success in this total book organization. A Kolasinac sale failed last night. No interest has been shown in Sokratis or Chambers although, presumably, none need to play. Surely a receiver may have been discovered on a team in the middle of the table or the bottom half of those?It’s because Saliba has been with us for two months and we’re already looking to return him on loan (but we’ve failed).
In the middle of the field has come the time of Partey and it looks promising. I am very pleased to have annoyed a leading Spanish team when it was bought given the history of those clubs that are destabilizing our players. The day when the single-rhythm Xhaka is not the first automatic selection will have to be held. Ceballos is a smart loan to the extent that we want it, a sensible resolution for all stakeholders. Torreira and Guendouzi in loans is probably the right technique since they can be just their price and/or we will come back and us in the future. However, we lack much creativity and the inability to generate a budget for Aouar is not only disappointing, it is a problem. The fact that Elneney (hard but fairly limited worker) is back with us and we will probably get some games is a sign that our move-in transactions in recent years have not been a success.
In offensive roles, champagne plugs were appearing in Aubameyang and, in the short term, that’s correct. More than 20 goals according to the season, the captain and I have been saying for a while that we want to avoid being a “soft touch” through wasting our most productive players for little money. Time will tell if it’s any other “Ozil. “High salaries for a 32-year-old whose game is based on speed and a lethal ending. What happens when the speed decreases?down and/or avoids scoring?Willian was lazy but raises similar concerns. The elephant in the room is, of course, Ozil. Turns out there’s no chance he’ll leave, but none of him will show up at the bank. What the hell happened to the lock-up?So we’re stuck in a loveless marriage where it’s all just a matter of money. Lacazette hasn’t scored enough yet, that’s tomorrow’s problem.
Overall, it’s great that we don’t pull down our pants as happened with Pepe (worth part of the value we paid) on the move-in fee. But all of the above makes us wonder what we did with Ramsey. We withdrew from this agreement because we did not need to pay a weekly salary higher than an older/senior player. We have now searched Auba and Willian in similar circumstances. So who’s fair? We let 75 million players go through nothing for wages. Just to spend the wages of an older player to upgrade the one we spend $75 million buying. Irritating. We also seem completely unable to accept small movement fees for players to take off the payroll. There may be something in the economy about not amortizing/cutting assets to which you can assign positive values, but I don’t see how to pay the salaries of Sokratis, Chambers, Saliba, etc. this season, just so they can help, install Auba’s education cones, it’s still stupid.
In reaction to Nik (UTV) . . .
I’m a fan of Villa, not that I wanted, or wouldn’t want to, write about the 7-2 bombing of Villa in Liverpool, I only looked about seven times to despite all believing/confirming that this happened. , even after I’ve done it, I still don’t know much to say.
Although. . . Russell, CFL; although I agree that Villa was lucky in some cases (deviations, etc. ), they may only have scored four or five more, and in fact marked 2 more.
I also agree that Liverpool enthusiasts (and Klopp and the players) were magnanimous in defeat.
And so we had another day of groundhog from a window of movement . . . many links to most sensitive players we were never going to get (but just take a look at the clicks, Ed said) and the last 24 hours of panic buy Manchester United. The hierarchy would like them to think that’s what they were making plans to buy from the beginning. I’m predicting ninth place this season and a new coach for next season. But what will replace Poch or Allegri? Another cycle of hope, of frustration, of anger that many Manchester United enthusiasts have eloquently expressed on this site before.
So here’s my dilemma: I love my club and like everything you love, I need it to succeed, but deep down with me, a component of me knows that this good fortune will never be achieved with existing ownership and control and that the Only Way The Stage will never replace due to a catastrophic money drop caused by the decline or an occasion that would drive out the sponsors.
Mr. Editor,
If he won the lottery and sought to live his dream as a true football coach by opting for a team difficult to understand from the lower league and taking him down the road to glory, it would be a bumpy and uncertain path.
I would like to spend a lot of cash beyond club limits (if you want to forget about FFP) for many things. You’ll have to spend smart for a smart coach and a smart team of coaches, splash a lot of players. , run the academy to help the club be sustainable, expand or rebuild the stadium and make sure the ‘logo’ recovers the enthusiasts. It’s not easy to succeed and, despite all the money invested in the game, it’s still the same clique of big clubs with some remarkable additions that earn it all.
It’s not a rhetorical consultation and I ask it because I’m really surprised, but why don’t you need to make a good fortune with the team you’ve owned lately?I sense all the arguments to keep Manchester United in the most sensible 4 and reduce their profits, yet will a circle of family members of businessmen realize Manchester United’s incredible prospects?ran the SAF CLUB football club.
Not that they don’t spend much, that’s really the problem. They spent tons of absolute waste or players who didn’t agree. So why are those, I suppose the boys wise enough, don’t say ‘okay, we’re shit, how are we going to be the most productive again?’Thin fool with a polytechnic title knows his noodles and tractors, however, if we had a guy who could put the look of football in order, think of all the other Odds Array. . tampons, EPI, those toys that were popular a few years ago, virtual reality glasses, laces . . . The number of potential official partners is endless! And we don’t even have to spend beyond our limits . . . We just have to think a little bit that’s it! Basically, we diminished our exposure, however, prospectively we gained much more!No wonder we’re all fucked!
Serious answers, please, because I’m completely lost for ideas, but why are the owners so un ambitious?
I deserve to start by saying that I’m not at any of the ABU things that are sometimes thrown into the mailbox, so I agree with Ole’s assessment that he doesn’t have many models. separated and well drilled to play, yet I don’t agree with some themes and I need to raise what I think hurts.
The first is the need for game patterns; Mourinho and Ancelotti have also not shown that the groups do not want to play at all in Klopp and Guardiola’s express taste systems to win. There is also a danger to the Klopp and Guardiola system, basically because players have a tendency to lose sight if this plan does not work.
Another challenge, which we saw at City last year and it looks like we’re starting to see with Liverpool, is how exhausting it is to play that way mentally. Basically, you ask players to be robots, and when that data is new and fresh, the effects can be good, but humans also wear out. This has been said about Guardiola: how painful it is to play. Besides, it’s something Ferguson has never done and I think that’s one of the reasons for his success. Fergie that if there was a red card in a match, Fergie let the players fix the challenge on the field and shows how he treated it He had a way he looked for the team to play, but it was a way that allowed a lot of non-public freedom, and I think that’s one of the reasons we’ve noticed that so many players play for Fergie for at least five years and more , not to mention 10 . . .
It can work, we just don’t see it running completely at Manchester United (and Ole probably wouldn’t have the personality for that).
The other thing is the players – I wrote an email about Pogba, Martial and Rashford last week and I keep each and every word I said, I don’t know if it’s a generational change, but Manchester United have too many players who didn’t seem to be ultra-competitive. I grew up watching Rooney, Keane, Scholes, Neville, Ferdinand, Vidic and others who seemed to see the festival as a matter of pride and a victory like anything they would do anything to get a defeat. them in a way that doesn’t seem to be the way for Manchester United players right now. Even when I compare Calvert-Lewin’s attitude to Martial, it’s amazing. Too austere.
Manchester United have at least a handful of players who, it turns out that a football adjustment is a disadvantage for them; they know they have to, but they prefer to do anything else. Van de Beek is very embarrassed by what he’s looking for, and it’s in Ole that he doesn’t play. Which brings me to Array. .
Ole has no excuse not to return to the effort with how the effects are right now, and it is worse than the models or the smile, Arteta and Moyes either gave up their reputation and charge the players to do the most productive for the team, and they were both right to do so. I also strongly disagree with what has been said about the player charge, which means that he has not been able to get the most out of it; We’ve all been watching football for too long to know that player load doesn’t count for much; now West Ham proves it too, and there are many other examples.
I’d judge you for not creating a plan to get the most out of less talented players to exclude the maximum expensive, but I don’t care how much Lindelof costs; it’s a disadvantage. I would also judge on him the lack of a replacement in education and a replacement of staff; Why not play a 4-3-3 with two 8 Fernandes and De Beek with Fred sitting down?Why not move on to 3-4-1-2 to charge solidity and have Rashford and Greenwood play as strikers with De Beek in middle of Camp 2 and Fernandes in front?
The other thing is this movement window. The media didn’t like it, and its third place last year turns out to have a giant asterisk next door, and I think it could be bigger (what I do), justified a movement of that window. He went from sixth to third, his signings had worked well last year and it was a chance to start. This mail about Manchester United spent after winning the Champions League would possibly be in the middle, however, I would not have judged that Ole had let the media know that there was a bit of unhappiness.
Calm Manchester United enthusiasts: there’s plenty of hope.
Utds’ move-in plans, however, have come true, Liverpool and City are wasting problems left, right and centre opposite the groups they swept away last season, not the undefeated players they once were.
It’s wonderful to see that we’ve signed a left-back for the future, Telles, at 27, will offer a higher festival for Shaw (25) and Williams (20) and it will probably last longer; this must have been a precedence signing. without a doubt.
It’s also smart to see that we’ve added another young striker to Cavani, a 33-year-old. Definitely a player, I greet our headhunters for watching him for about 10 years to be sure before signing him, wonderful pictures, guys, let’s see. If our medical team can make your component now. It will help other young people expand and I’m sure it’s the most profitable option to do what other clubs are probably wasting their time and money. . . to train. I’m glad we didn’t have Sancho, I would have given a bad symbol of the ones we have and I wouldn’t have as much to tell you about Cavani (I could give her a bad symbol too).
And we hired a promising 23-year-old midboxer in Donny. I’m sure you’ll have more minutes in the area at some point when other midboxers get tired or lose shape. But while Pogba, Fernandes, Matic, Fred and His teammates keep flipping in style, it’s understandable that there’s no room for Donny with only two games a week to pick the players.
Central defense is where Utd got him out of the park. We have many players to “compete” for the central places, all with talents very similar to each other, so we may also stay with Lindelof and Maguire. Like signing Sancho, a shiny new central defender would have been a challenge to make what we have worse, so it’s probably best not to shake the boat, let’s keep telling our highly paid stars how smart they are.
I am not an apologist for Woodward, and I am not convinced through OGS as Manchester United coach, however, I think a slightly balanced opinion on the relative good fortune of United’s exchange operations would not be a problem.
It is true that if the City had bought Cavani, the press would have unmished the following: “Here Pep has a hole in his team, snaps his hands and gets one of the forwards from the global as a short-term solution. “United buys a guy who breaks up yesterday. I’m pretty sure the same would be said of Chelsea and/or Arsenal if they had tried their luck with Cavani. If it turns out it’s more Falcao than Zlatan, then okay, you’re fine. , and I’m wrong.
As for Sancho, if there was ever an example of “British Overload” in evidence, then it will have to be. $100 million is a stupid value to pay for enormously green talent, regardless of monetary circumstances. Personally, I am extremely happy that Manchester United has not fallen into the advertising hype, possibly a perfect player, but also Kagawa and Mkhitaryan . . . in the two-horse race that is the Bundesliga.
I think safe adulthood and the enjoyment of Manchester United’s appearance are more obligatory than any other party attendant (in each and every sense of the word), but maybe it’s just me who’s an old fart.
Yes, the defense is a disaster and too slow. Yes, I would have liked to see a cell center and experienced return. But much of the mess will have to be about training, or rather because of his absence.
3 games, 3 numbers and a purpose of -6 – Bad Ed. Bad, bad Ed!
It is clear that Ed is to blame for the top central defender wanted in world football to look like someone who won a tie in which the first prize was a possibility to play a fit with his favorite team (and we need to know that Maguire was bought through Ole, not through Ed, you see, all players perceived as smart were bought through Ole. Only the bad guys were bought through Ed. This is Manchester United Way).
It’s also obviously Ed’s fault if his much-loved right-back (also bought through Ole, remember) spends most of the games running in the box looking for someone to attack, because that’s all he knows how to do. it was bought through Ed when he plays, but was bought through Ole while he is not, but deserves to be, constantly shows that it is a wonderful physical presence, but not a football brain in his head. Shaw, who is the best example of this FIFA player controlled through a 5-year-old boy with a joystick, Ed ruined it. At least Ole’s already bought a new left-back, or maybe Ed bought it?We’ll see when he plays some games.
So assembling probably the most expensive backline ever noticed in the Premier League, be it in terms of moving fees and salaries, makes Ed the villain, while the guilty user for making them play into something akin to a tactical formula is the irreproachable victim. I had Ole’s homework and I’m glad I didn’t have Ed’s.
So many angles and feelings come to this email, however, I will try to be as direct and rational as possible, which is precisely the ‘theme of 2020’.
What about Manchester United right now?
Possibly not be the manager, however, when he fixed, he put the wheels moving in the shit display which peaked on Sunday and doubled on Monday.
When he left us a backup for Evra, Vidic and/or Ferdinand, we were still updates for Keane and Scholes, while, of course, Valencia was never going to upgrade to Ronaldo.
Sir Alex and David Gill would sometimes be covered through these transfers, instead, or they leave and entrust the reins to Woodward and Moyes, who upgrade many coaches and duly hand us a Fellaini, a Zaha and yet a Mata. of the five where we needed and Moyes leaves him for allegedly beating his daughter.
This is the time of time that this would deserve to have been corrected if it had ever been corrected. It was time to rent to José Mourinho and let him build a team. Arriving from Madrid with fireplace in the abs and a team full of old canned champions with.
Instead, LVG, who came behind because of a World Cup and then was given a lot of “who the hell are they?Red, Herrera, Blind, Depay, DarmianArray . . . not bad, not great and not a player the top enthusiasts knew before Old Trafford. (I enjoyed Herrara but rarely am an 8/10 player)
I’m going to avoid the story here since what happened. A Mourinho came in more bitter than a tea bag sitting all night in a teapot made of spent coffee.
It was supported by the market and you can see the gaps it tried to fill. Lukaku was a bit of what we needed, Matic was what we needed, just like Bailly (even though it fits into the LVG category). in the end he didn’t get it yet at least there were gaps left to fill.
That brings me to my point. Since the saf exit, we still had to upgrade Vidic and Ferdinand (Harry Maguire maybe because it charges 80 m), Evra has just been updated. There is no Keane (Matic is as close as you can imagine and it is like calling Keane “brilliant”) You can say that Fernandes can be a scholes replacement (not the same player, so no) and no one has updated Ronaldo yet.
So it’s a generous 4/6 and a 1/6 realist.
In the most sensible of that, there were never enough replacements for Giggs, Young, Valencia, Smalling, Evans, Rooney, Nani, Hernandez, Carrick and RVP in the following years.
In this movement window, however we were given a replacement RVP (only Messi and Ronaldo have more targets since 08/07 than Cavani) (it is ahead of Aguero) (in addition, quite well).
So out of the 16 (6 before SAF, 10 after SAF) we signed on February 16 and adding the existing squad members, you can bring it to October 16.
In seven years, we have gone from Premier League champions who had played in 3/5 European Cup finals until then to any incarnation. We’ve lost tricky extremes, strong advocates, skilled and talented midfielders and terrifying goalscorers, the club has the foresight. to know when to cut and replace that.
Now we have a defense made up of putty, without extremes, sloths and terrifying informal midfielders and scorers, the club has as much foresight as any human in 2019.
We’ll finish with the Glazers.
Through astonishing control and signatures, SAF has formed a team to outline an era. It was excellent, but I think possibly, in spite of everything, it’s what’s killing us.
Since its arrival, the successes we have achieved are Carrick, Berbz, Vidic, Evra, Van De Sar, Park, Nani, Anderson, Tevez, Hernandez, DDG and RVP the saf withdrawal. None of them made sense. Thanks to SAF.
After SAF, you can say Herrera, Martial and Ibra, it’s on a push of 3, but more only in 2.
Blame Moyes, LVG, MouMou, OleArray. . even if you want to.
Systems seem to be what all groups have been using lately. Gone are the days when we send the children to do what they can do.
Klopp arrived with a four-3 3 playing ball for the goalkeeper, attacking his back, playing cb ball, defensive shield, strong running midfielder, purpose scorers, ends and a deep striker.
Pep also likes the 4 3 3, but with more passes, more cunning and less power than a Klopp midfielder. This was followed by many effects of position, movement and pass intelligence.
Even Leicester when they won the league with a compact team of four four two.
For more than ten years, Man Utd ventures with four 2 3 1: Who and which players for this formula do you think they need?I’ll never know. Here’s what they have of the existing computer:
This we have 11/24 players that we want for this formula with 2 more in-depth playmakers.
I saw a mailbox that said the mailbox was incredibly heavy at Manchester United, and Andrew, you’re right.
Jack Grealish, just wow. I felt that his English was what made him dear. Turns out I’m right, but he’s also an amazing footballer.
Unused football is attractive from the point of view of sports psychology. Would Sunday ever do it with enthusiasts?Can some players do better without thousands of people yelling at them or worse without that?Is this 12th player missing for some groups and helping others?
This new “Well, the regulation says the hands are in a disastrous position. . . “is the greatest horseshoe load in history. It is based on the referee and the referees make mistakes. Everton’s game on point. A turn of fate affects a penalty (not much Ward can do), a turn of fate doesn’t (DCL helps keep his arm through his side, but he has time to move it, he doesn’t, but he doesn’t). avoid a shot connected to the purpose with your arm. )
The pin penalty rule. Control genuine properties and pass pictures for Uber. De Gea’s stored penalty resumes, 2 inches from its line. It is ok. Sunday opposed to Tottenham, hold the line, jump forward, don’t save. There’s no recovery this time. It’s not great.
The rule game is solid. It’s still strange to see him, you almost feel like you did it when you were 17 and you went beyond the safety of a club, I don’t know what to do or what happens to Array. . but a clever addition anyway.
About Arsenal, for Partey’s signature, I say this: perhaps the new heir to Patrick Vieira’s throne.
And speaking of the thrones of Arsenal, the throne of Thiery Henry, it can be said that Mr. Aubameyang lately holds the valuable number 14, but, in the Premier League, the highest worthy of such an honor that I would like to give nothing less than the superstar of the Spurs Son. His first weekend purpose simply oozed Henry. Be gives games to groups to the fullest and it’s so fast. Thierry Heung-Min!
Record the number of consequences per season. Record for a while.
Refresh your browser to view this website. Update my browser now
×