Release date: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 2:49
Keep sending your theeditor@football365. com.
First, Pogba and Bruno give a lot of the ball, statistically they are similar in that sense. But Bruno gives him up to 30 additional yards on the field, and for them, he makes a key pass or the ability to score a goal. Pogba provides the ball around the center circle while many team members are in front of the total team has to paint harder to recover.
Second, Pogba makes no effort when he loses the ball. There was a 30-second clip that someone had kindly shared on social media, from the Palace game, which shows him wasting the ball and walking, while Bruno returns from a complex position, retrieves the ball and rushes. He goes to Pogba and loses it again. It’s not just that he’s a bum, thanks to him, Bruno and McTominay have to hug him and fall deeply constantly, restricting the former’s ability to influence things at the other end, or to leave gaps on the other side, in case of problems. Last.
Third, rival midfielders know that when they hit the surface, Pogba will stick with their careers. Come back and watch Eriksen’s purpose in the first minute in last year’s Spurs v United game. And there are many others.
I write with a quick reaction to Alex, Ayr regarding his inquiry into what he has replaced between the June F365 article that proposes Lindelof of Man United as a ”forgotten hero” and a recent list that mentions him as one of the ten players. wants to be replaced in the PL.
Before I do this, I thank my mailbox friend, Mark Danger Endicott, for his clever wishes after my dog’s sad death a few weeks ago. Enjoy smart thoughts, buddy. I’m tempted to try a sourd dough sausage sandwich after reading your mail (in honor of Shay, of course), thinking that an Aldi apple sausage could happen with that. . . Hmmm. I’m also a kind of subtle jahaha tastes.
About Lindelof, after reading the ten most sensible and what has been written, I think the two articles are a little complementary, strange as it may seem, a little in keeping with my own vision of the comrade.
I think he’s the kind of player who seems ‘pretty smart’ to Manchester United, until he’s exposed in one or more key matches, because he’s not quite at the point we want. I would use defeat to Sevilla in Europa Liga as the moment it happened to me, that doesn’t mean I’m not smart enough for one of the four/six most sensible TEAMS in the PL, or that I haven’t had a very smart season, so it deserves a nod for “Unsung Hero”. Only he probably wouldn’t be smart enough for a team that needs to pursue the most sensible place in the championship, winning cups at home and in Europe.
In other words, it is perfectly imaginable that a player is a forgotten hero for a team that can potentially finish in third place in the league and succeed in the semi-finals of various cup competitions (but not go further) and also for that player it will have to be slightly below the required point of a team that wins the title.
Should I finish beforehand that F365 skilfully crossed this nuanced tightrope while writing its articles?If they look anything like me, I’d say it’s more about looking for their performances at the end of the season and knowing that Lindelof is rarely up to the task, who knows?
Is it imaginable that my preference to see Harry Maguire succeed can introduce a bias?Bring me, favor Lindelof’s sacrifice for a player with a little more pace, in order to more offset Harry’s respective deficit. . . Maaaayyybbeeee . . .
That does not mean that they are not here to make money. They clearly are. And that is your right as entrepreneurs in a capitalist world. But as emphasized, smart fortune begets smart fortune. So having a smart fortune in the till will bring in more cash. For me (Clive) they have to divide the “Man Utd Company” into two departments. Have Ed Woodward head the business department as we all joke that United has noodle spouses, however he was able to find a Noodle spouse to sponsor a soccer club so he’s going to have to be smart about something. Array Glaziers uses it to earn their money. Then you have a football department, whose budget is based on what the advertising department does; it’s run the same way I think Liverpool does – no cash is transferred for profit. This is controlled through soccer men. A CEO (Edwin is the apparent answer because that’s what he does at Ajax, no football director like other people make the mistake of assuming), then a football director to oversee the long-term plan of the football team. We hope this leads to a smarter fortune, which in turn is helping the commercial department maximize profits. It would also be a useful style at this time, where earnings for the day are declining – the advertising department can then “bail out” the football department for the time being, this is a much-needed problem.
What would Lampard do on the bench? Well, I think if we don’t make it in the 4 most sensible that would lower the curtain for sure, you can’t have a team we have and don’t make the Champions League, rarely even completing moment assures you of any other. season, you can ask Carlo everton about his views. , we deserve to be waiting to enter the QF phase, a national cup will be summed up in a bit of luck and will not only come from who you draw in each turn. fans, does the merit of the house exist right now at the time?but also, how does the opponent see the game, play a weakened look or do his best?
The ramifications: This, of course, will have a huge effect on the local community, as the club’s borrowers will likely be local. Players are also at risk of running out of lost wages, however I hope and hope that their union will participate. Players who help pay their peers’ salaries can be more likable than players who signal to pay offshore entrepreneurs who haven’t done anything to cash out since they started. took over the club. The club may want to go back part time first, or whatever the domain can to restart. It seems much more practical than rushing to remain an indebted company, where the entire budget would like to pass to those with bad reputations or “administrators” willing to tax £ 57. 48 for each photocopy and a fortune for each. and every email sent. Most likely this plan will also require a bit of management, that the passing government is doing its best to destroy and withdraw funds from the regional councils, but if a centralized pot were created through wealthy benefactors or clubs from the Premier League, this is what I think the most productive way to use one’s budget would be.
Frankly, I would be surprised if all Premier League clubs survive all this, when many already have pay/income percentages at harmful levels, even before wasting tickets, a game day and a corporate source of revenue for 2-thirds of the season (at least), and perhaps more if TELEVISION corporations can’t meet the contracts they’ve signed (is there any other itV virtual drink?). If the elite is in trouble, we will have to consider anything radical for most, and this drastic action may simply be to let some of the former football entities back down, but at least provide an environment for something positive to be built later. .
It will also have to be said that the supporters of the 50 + 1 rule are alarming now, when would it be possible for wealthy benefactors to intervene?
My suggestion: is to allow access to the club’s internet sites to broadcast the games live, for a fee. Membership holders have automatic access, with ticket fees refunded for the difference. Club members get slightly higher value than the game, and non-member fans pay more than members. Considering that my club, Spurs, has 17 million foldecreces on Facebook alone, it opens up a significant, albeit temporary, profit stream. Suppose a subscription holder will pay five pounds depending on the game, a member 7 and a non-member nine pounds, which can help to fit or exceed the gate winnings. If we assume that only 10% of those 17 million subscribers would pay to watch a game online, that only adds up to 1. 7 million people. That’s a potential (at nine pounds consistent with the viewer) of 1. 5 million pounds. Unlikely numbers, consistent with maybe, but even a third of them would still exceed gate winnings and could even create a way to generate budget for league clubs, structures and testing for dwindling clubs. falling league, etc.
I have been living in Germany for 18 years and watching online matches has been risky, apart from the season in which Dazn showed virtually every Spurs match (for 10 euros per month). for the games, probably not all of them, but well, I hadn’t been to each and every game when I lived in London.
On Saturday, however, I was able to get off my mountain to attend my first game of the season, which ended with Zweigen Kanazawa 1-2 Wasp Fukuoka. The purpose of the victory was a purpose opposed to its appearance that became more comical through the line judging who slid while watching to keep up with the game. Zweigen probably didn’t deserve to lose, but Fukuoka is on a five-game winning streak. I urge you to look for Mutsuki Kato’s tie for Zweigen, a fantastic twist and finish just a minute after granting.
The point of my mail are the coronavirus prevention measures that are in position in all J. League matches, which made an experience. Before we entered the cockpit, they sprayed our hands with disinfectant, took our temperature and scanned our entrances. QR codes, but other people with paper tickets had to break them themselves. Viewers are asked (mandatory? I don’t know how strong Japanese writing is) they wear masks, and they all fit them.
Once in the stadium it was very quiet, usually enthusiasts sing for 90 minutes, however lately it is forbidden to make a song, any kind of scream or make a song, swing towels (here is a trick), crash all five or sit too close to other people with which you have not come. There’s also no alcohol for sale in stadiums. Participation is limited to 50% of capacity or 5,000 more people, depending on the lowest amount; there were about 2,300 in Saturday’s game, but Zweigen on average, four to 5,000 anyway. Outdoor fans are not allowed, this has not prevented others from buying tickets from local enthusiasts at certain matches.
In early September, applause to the rhythm of the music or other people was allowed, but apart from that and the occasional cheers, panties or groans, there is not much noise. I’ve heard other people compare it to tennis yet. for me it’s more like a cricket attack but without the general discussion.
It is attractive to hear how the coaches and especially the players talk to each other on the field, but I discovered some other similarity to cricket: the constant barking of the Fukuoka goalkeeper reminded me of watching on TV when the stump mic sounds too loud. And the doorman won’t shut up
This can give other mailboxes a concept of what it will be like when they can play again. I hope it’s soon.
Will this mean the end of some clubs? Yes, unfortunately, will there be massive inequalities along the w. r. t. pyramid. those who sink? Yes, because only the monster that is the Premier League will continue and will not allow a more sensible club to go bankrupt mid-season, with huge sums of money coming from TELEVISION rights, not to mention the global audience (newly awarded due to its own blockades), it must be said that there will be a way ahead for football in one way or another.
But it may only mean the end of some stadiums and the crowds that accompany them. Expect to see more floor percentage agreements and paintings between local clubs to make sure you go back to football with the crowd when it’s all over. see Euro 2021 presented as the wonderful hope for this, but evidently (like so many others) is now in the hands of the (medical) gods. For clubs mainly/totally depfinishents in seasonal passes and tickets, this will be an incredibly bitter pill, and as top players in the entertainment industry, they will wait fall to see what help the government can offer them to approve them.
The big question is surely: can we locate a new style of football, prioritizing enthusiasts, the network and the region?Most clubs will say they already do, but enthusiasts (including myself) will say they feel more like cows than as components Involve those other people in the club, and forging genuine price links and components (not just economic ones) will be the key.
So it’s only fair that he also gives credit when it’s due.
I just read that Spurs enthusiasts bought products worth about 20,000 euros at the Leyton Orient store to pay for them commercially at the club after their game was postponed.
Normal will resume shortly . . .
I’m in a position to take Lampard as “The Puncture of the Week” seriously until I read the following sentence:
“Lampard seems a fairly moderate human being, but also conservative. So, to sleep at night, you’ll probably have to be well accustomed to imagining fictional realities of choice where everything is fine. “
Honestly, 365 more political nonsense, you just look like rampant hacks. The political reviews of the coach and the footballer are not even commented on on this site because they have nothing to do with their football behavior. Dave Tickner has each and every one of them, right to write what he wants, yet any competent editor has eliminated anything about his political perspectives that could alienate a giant component of his readers (before the answers attack me on the basis of a hypothesis, I’m not a conservative and I never voted for them).
You just ruined what promised to be a fun new column this season, so you and you’re the Sting of the Week.
Can F365 avoid this feature?
I love you because it balances the wonderful cynicism of tabloids with positive features about the game and the players we admire, informed columns full of lists/stairs and a cracked mailbox of football lovers reacting to those pieces.
I pass F365 because it makes me feel smart when I read about the game I like. You do football reports without resorting to misleading or unsightly headlines (and worthy of interest) that are not unusual elsewhere.
Hello
He chose Frank Lampard as his selection, however, for very precarious reasons, the disposable commentary after the game may have been 1-1. First, I think Frank has stated in detail that the right occasions have consequences. he made that mistake and Chelsea won a penalty, so yes, it may have been 1-1. You’re unlikely to know, yet. Second, Frank sought to deflect the complaint (as all coaches do), asked the team to score a (understandable) tie and this failed once the expulsion occurred.
Third, all managers have a selective hindsight, Frank is no different.
Anyway, I’d have the idea that there were much more worthy candidates for the coup of the week:
Keiran Gibbs – ridly expelled while his team was fine
Ralph Hassenhutl: Play a stupid defensive line allowing Son to score those goals
Martin Atkinson – for handball and the resumption of this palace penalty
Now I’m my penis of the week: Dave Tickner.
– Football365 (F365) 23 September 2020
What did you do?1) Ignored applicants (see above) and 2) Purchased the policy at a football forum.
A precedent? Yes, he’s already spread his liberal perspectives on this before.
Attenuation? No.
Call it Prem, Premier League or PL.
But please, please, never stain the reputation of F365 readers by calling it EPL again.
Refresh your browser to view this website. Update my browser now
×