Release date: Thursday, December 10, 2020 11:59 a. m.
Here’s what Custis wrote a long time ago when this incredibly elongated “finale” was just beginning:
“You don’t consult the boss, not one as smart and tough as Mourinho.
”Now the crispy exit door is now on its hinges with Barcelona waiting to jump.
Even if we forget the wandering apostrophe, it’s spectacularly wrong. In the 3 month area, the exit door opened and this “good and powerful” boss was ejected. A few months later, Pogba was named to the PFA team of the year.
Two years later, Pogba is still there and has survived many attempts through Custis to push that door.
“PAUL POGBA’s manchester United career has ended with the desperate player and club” – Neil Custis and Richard Moriarty, The Sun, 3 January.
“MANCHESTER UNITED will let Paul Pogba pass this summer as part of a discounted deal after he nevertheless signed Bruno Fernandes” – Neil Custis, The Sun, January 30.
“PAUL POGBA has been kind enough to leave Manchester United” – Neil Custis, The Sun, February 7.
Paul POGBA’s Manchester United career is over. Despite signs that a peace agreement is being reached, both sides are divided”- Neil Custis, The Sun, March 19.
It can be assumed that a “division of roads” is clearly different from a “separation of roads” and deserves its own exclusivity.
And now, the last page of The Sun tells us – exclusively, of course – that ”Manchester United leaders are tired of missing Paul Pogba to leave the club’, as if Manchester United had taken over and somehow wins this war to, uh, give Pogba the move he desperately needs for a reduced value of 50 million pounds , which probably means clubs can do it. He’s going to be bloodied.
“He commissioned Mourinho’s task when the former United technician expelled Pogba from his team and stripped him of the vicecapitan. “
This was probably more similar to the fact that Manchester United had won only one of six Premier League matches, leaving 19 issues to leader Liverpool and 11 fewer issues than one place in the Champions League.
Or, as Custis himself wrote when Mourinho fired:
“It was constant advice that he had not received support in the moving market that infuriated Executive Vice President Ed Woodward and the Glazers.
“Those who did not need to turn against the players and the boss were more than happy to point the coaching area with their finger.
“However, the scenes, they denied with their heads.
They how an expense of 400 million pounds on 11 players had resulted in this.
“It’s been bigger than that. “
Two years, and a new Manchester United public relations device afterwards, and the message is that it is Totally Pogba’s fault, just as it was entirely his fault that United lost Tuesday to Leipzig. Can we blame him for Covid, too?
“His mistake in awarding the third goal in Tuesday’s 3–2 loss to RB Leipzig was the last straw.
“Could you even call it a mistake? He just didn’t like the stage when the ball fell on its six-metre surface in the 69th minute.
Don’t blame Harry Maguire, he let the ball pass with the confidence that any goalkeeper would be off his line and in a position to pick him up.
“Pas De Gea, who is caught in his line as danger looms.
In fact, he still had a chance to get out and suffocate the ball to knock down Justin Kluivert.
“Instead, he was ashamed and turned his back on him.
“United legend Paul Scholes is overwhelming.
“The former Red Devils midfielder said, ‘He bottled it. He’s afraid of hurting himself. It turns its back on it and it’s smaller. “
“It’s for a doorman with so much experience. ” “
It is strange how Custis misses the component of Scholes’ quote where he says “Harry Maguire is rigid and rigid” to have compatibility with his account that Solskjaer’s signature record is by no means to blame.
No, that was not the case; has earned the right to an appeal that has not yet been heard. That’s a vital clarification. Then he’ll tell us that he’s actually appealed by opposing the so-called “wood and other things. “
Wake us up when a former Manchester United partner from Solskjaer does more than his friend.
So who said Man Utd had “set a strangely low selling price”?Who are they trading for? Start. . .
“Manchester United set a strangely low selling price for Paul Pogba before the January move-in window, according to reports. “
Oh, just quoting himself. It seems reasonable, fair and completely ethical.
“There is a strong conviction that despite their fall from the Champions League on Tuesday at RB Leipzig, United can challenge the name this season. The executive is disappointed to be in the Europa League, but Solskjor’s win rate and the team’s continued rebuilding, which inspired them, allowed him his support.
“It is considered significant that when United receives Manchester City in Saturday’s derby, only five tracks will be co-leader Tottenham and Liverpool, with one match in hand and the club remains in the contest in four trophies. “
It is also significant that Manchester United have not yet competed in two of those trophies and have already left a competition, but Jackson has books for sale, so move on. . .
“The hiring of Bruno Fernandes through the manager in February is seen as a catalyst: Since then, United has been on a par with Liverpool in issues won. After 10 Premier League games this season, United’s 19 issues and the 19 goals are greater than the thirteen tracks and thirteen goals last season when they finished third.
It’s Manchester United’s worst start to the season in 33 years, so it’s not a smart comparison. In addition, it would probably be appealing to note that United conceded 17 goals compared to last season’s 10 at the same stadium, but Jackson has books. for sale, so go ahead . . .
Among his predecessors in this post-Ferguson era, Solskjor’s 56% win rate in 108 matches in all competitions (60 wins) is a time opposed to Mourinho’s 58% in 144 matches (84), 53% of Moyes beating him third (27 out of 51) and Van Gaal last with 52% (54, 103).
And they fired Mourinho (although it’s Pogba’s fault).
Recommended of the day
Refresh your browser to view this website. Update my browser now
×