Release date: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 12:07 p.m.
Chelsea will not be happy to be informed of the “shocking” arrangements of Liverpool and Manchester United. Until they realize where they come from …
The bad news: Neil Custis claims to have his finger on the pulse of the dead horse he is still whipping.
Jadon Sancho now faces “the possibility of applying for a move or it is not easy to leave”. And a “” that involves two answers that necessarily come back to the same thing is never fun.
“The German club has appointed an agent as an intermediary to negotiate with United and has turned down its offer of 70 million pounds, emerging at 110 million pounds on the basis of honors and appearances.”
Remember when Manchester United “forced the Germans to settle for staggered payments, with 70 million pounds upfront”? Do. That was eight days ago.
“Sancho’s representatives also rejected United’s contract offer. They will offer about 220,000 euros consistent with the week, and the sancho look will need about 250,000 euros consistent with the week.”
Remember when you reported that “Sancho will sign a four-year contract, 220,000 euros consistent with the week, with the option of the club look to enlarge it by a year”? Do. That was eight days ago.
The wait continues.
The Daily Mirror has the latest news on how ‘Man Utd can simply hijack Chelsea’s Havertz movement if Sancho’s chase gets frustrated.’
That sounds good. There are no random quotes in the title. Is that your information?
“Manchester United can simply divert Chelsea’s movement by offering a signal to Kai Havertz if he doesn’t make a deal for Jadon Sancho.”
Oh, the bullets.
And United has not given up hope of signing Sancho, if they remain frustrated, they may turn to Havertz, according to the Manchester Evening News. ”
At least they are similar to the original source. On the Luckhurst mobile!
Except it was Richard Fay who was commissioned to write an article on ‘Six Chances of Jadon Sancho for Manchester United after the play update’. It’s a speculative opinion piece. But let it go through the Mirror’s click device and you’ll have a great story of moves based on everything.
‘Man Utd considers a bid of 70 million pounds for Chelsea’s movement target in Frank Lampard’s primary hit’
And cry a little inside.
“Chelsea star Antonio Rudiger, wanted through Liverpool in a surprise move with Lampard willing to unload and Klopp looking back” – The Sun.
“Liverpool” shows his interest “in Chelsea ace Antonio Rudiger after Dejan Lovren” – Daily Star.
“Liverpool moves live news: Reds ordered Zaha Sarr, Chelsea as Rudiger addressed” – talkSPORT.
“It looks like Liverpool has a moving interest in the Chelsea ace that Frank Lampard could sell” – Daily Express.
‘Chelsea rumours: 71.9 million pounds of Kai Havertz fares negotiated, Liverpool looks at Antonio Rudiger’ – Football, London
“Paper Talk: Liverpool surprises Chelsea headquarters” – TEAMtalk.
See? All the greats say it. And link to this short line in a live movement blog Mundo Deportivo.
“The Antonio R-Diger centre can count the hours in Chelsea and one of the groups that has shown the utmost interest in resuming theirs is Liverpool, which is still looking for a power after Lovren’s departure to Zenit.”
At least it’s coming from somewhere. Which is fine until you realize that there is probably a translation error in The Sun’s own story on Sunday morning, in which he warned that Chelsea must tell Liverpool to target Ben White ‘and abandon Antonio Rudiger in the process.’
Mundo selects it, gets it at the end of the stick, the clue is that they buried him in a live movement blog instead of making a genuine story about him, which they would actually do if he were exclusive, and everyone becomes voluntarily without thinking about it even once because they can simply point with their hand elsewhere. Textbook.
– Sports witness (@Sport_Witness) 11 August 2020
The Sun put on its website:
‘Frank Lampard enjoys the summer holidays with his circle of relatives after the anguish of the FA Cup’
But how many DAYS later?
“Lampard even threw himself from a trampoline into the sea while Christine looked at herself in a white dress.”
What’s next? Don’t we sunbathe too?
There is a difference between “finally” naming your child and “finally” confirming his call to a media outlet who does not have the divine right to know. Stop being weird.
Especially when they repeat this History of the Mail to tell us, “ARSENAL and Liverpool enthusiasts will be allowed to join Wembley for the Community Shield.”
Why would Liverpool enthusiasts be allowed to attend a match when the team’s participation is “shrouded in a mystery”?
Because now they could let you know next summer if you need to warn and you can do it.
Thank you. By. This.
Update your browser to view this website. Update my browser now
×