By the standards of most college football programs, the Clemson Tigers have a proud history, with a claim to the 1981 national championship and memorable postseason victories including the 2014 Orange Bowl. But as they entered the fourth quarter of the January 2016 national championship game, even with a 3-point lead and the sport’s No. 1 ranking, they still looked something like minnows next to the juggernaut Alabama Crimson Tide.
Indeed, Alabama emerged from impressive 15 minutes of football, which made an initial 95 yards serve outside and five tauchdowns combined, with a 45-40 victory, destroying the dream of the tigers of their first national name in 34 years. But what a sadness at that time turned out to be the beginning of a remarkable dynasty.
In the 3 seasons and more, the Tigers made two naming games, avenging Backst Alabama twice, and lost only 3 games in total. Clemson remains the most sensible favorite this season and is back at the most sensible of the leaderboard. forward position of the tide.
That tremendous on-field success has come with some impressive off-field dividends. The Tigers’ financial fortunes have grown so much, in fact, that Clemson now makes its debut on the annual Forbes list of college football’s most valuable teams; we credit the Tigers with average annual football revenue of $77 million, good for No. 25 in the country.
It turns out that the almost Miss 2015-2016 is also the turn of Clemson’s monetary performance. This season, the income of the football team, as indicated in the NCAA, higher to 15% in the annual sliding, and the general source of income of the sports branch increased for $ 105 million. In undeniable terms, victory can produce profits temporarily as the ticket request increases in folds, merchandise fly shelves and, above all, the old rich begin to break their checkbook. During the year of the first match of the Clemson Championship, the general contributions of the alumni in the sports branch increased from 80%to $ 35 million.
Graham Neff, Clemson’s assistant director of athletics, says the huge increase in athletics can’t be fully credited to football, as athletic breakdown also won philanthropic donations tied to projects that don’t “It’s hard to put in the top one percent, but obviously, at Clemson, football leads a giant component of those annual contrietions,” Neff explains. “There is a strong and strong correlation between the good fortune of football and the construction of contrations. “This donation was also supported: In 2017-2018, Clemson organized $40 million in sports contrietiones.
Clemson’s ranking among the nation’s top programs is especially impressive because the Tigers don’t have the benefit of massive conference distributions. Last year, the ACC distributed some $30 million per member school, neck-and-neck with the Pac-12 for the smallest payout among Power Five conferences. No wonder, then, that just one other ACC team cracks our top 25 (Florida State at No. 15, with average annual football revenue of $96 million across the three most recent seasons for which financial data is available: 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18). At least that revenue pipeline should soon widen, thanks to the new ACC Network, which began broadcasting this season. Neff wouldn’t discuss exact numbers, but he says the network is already exceeding revenue projections, adding, “We do anticipate a good uptick from last year to this year.”
Until now, however, Clemson has largely relied on its school-specific revenue streams. And although contributions have made up the lion’s share of the recently increased revenues, the Tigers have been strong across the board.
License and royalty earning $13. 6 million in 2017-18, up 68% from the year before Clemson first made the impression in the championship. And that generally doesn’t take into account Clemson’s new Nike deal; Last year, the sports branch extended its apparel contract through 2027-28, with Nike now paying a 14% royalty rate, compared to 11% between the money and retail price of the assigned team, the company is providing Clemson an average of $5. 7 million consistent with the year, more than double the past annual pay of $2. 6 million.
Ticket income is also up to $ 25 million, expanding up to 26% between 2014-15 and 2017-18, and this has less to do with the amount of tickets sold than Clemson’s ability to double its value that is worth the Pena explains Neff. Clemson would have the maximum football tickets at ACC, and their valuables are more in line with those of dry programs.
All that money has allowed Clemson to spend like a real contender. In 2017-18, Clemson’s football team set program records for spending on coach salaries ($14 million), game expenses ($3.4 million), recruiting ($1.8 million) and equipment ($1.8 million). In April, the school signed head coach Dabo Swinney to a ten-year, $93 million contract extension, the biggest deal ever given to a college football coach. Two years ago, Clemson opened the Allen N. Reeves Football Complex, a $55 million project that keeps the Tigers competitive in college football’s never-ending facilities arms race, and more money may be on the way for improvements at Memorial Stadium, after the athletic department reportedly poured in nearly $100 million from 2004 to 2015. Neff says the next major investments will focus on off-the-field athlete support, including “career services, financial literacy, leadership development and diversity and inclusivity programming.”
Clemson is not the only program to encourage him in the increasing tides of school football, however, the good monetary fortune of the Tigers stands out even in the context of school athletics, and continue to rise after taking a race of 15-0 and capture the championship last season (the monetary of that season would possibly not be informed until the end of the year) . Neff says that the year beyond the year has presented a stable monetary growth: the earnings of the license have a tensioning to be solid in the winning years of the title thanks to the merchandise of the championship, and the contraction have been stable despite the new fiscal law that was undone of the safe deductions of athletic donations.
But despite all this success, Neff says the main purpose for the next few years is to recognize that there is still a lot of scope to be done. “We tour a lot and our peers have had a lot of hits and they’re doing a lot of similar, impressive things,” Neff says, “so it’s not like Clemson is pioneering the full spectrum through any one stretch. “
It’s a sensible approach, and one very much grounded in truth: The nation’s most valuable programs still generate nearly twice as much money annually.
This year, Texas A&M again leads the way with $147 million in average football revenue. As we detailed last year, much of the Aggies’ recent earning power has come from a wave of alumni contributions tied to athletic construction projects. In 2017-18, contributions earmarked for football were $46 million, up 34% year-over-year.
It’s not the most sustainable revenue stream, since contributions should eventually fall toward previous levels—the athletic department’s CFO told USA Today that he expects revenues to “normalize” following 2019—but it’s not just generous alumni keeping the Aggies on top. The team also ranks third in revenue from ticket sales ($41 million), and the A&M athletic department is fifth among those on our list in total income from licensing and sponsorship deals ($19 million).
The AGGIES become the rival between the state of Texas Lonchorns for the first place; In fact, the two groups are connected to the annual medium football income, however, the AGGIES are in the lead thanks to a higher operational benefit, from 94 to 92 million dollars, which we use as equal leaps (our method is Describe in more detail below.
Texas, the monetary mastodon of sport, has a basis of national enthusiasts that provides a massive lever effect by negotiating its corporate associations: the Texas Athletics Department has approximately $ 43 million consisting of royalties and licenses of the year, blowing the box (Michigan is time at the time at the time at the time in the category, with $ 28 million). In addition, its Lonhorn network agreement with ESPN will pay at its athletics branch of about $ 12 million this year.
Michigan, Alabama and Ohio State round out the top five most valuable college football programs. The Buckeyes and the Wolverines are first and second in average annual football ticket revenue ($54 million and $44 million), and each ranks among the top five in sponsorship income. Alabama, meanwhile, is one of just five teams to earn more than $30 million annually from media rights. (The Crimson Tide are also the sport’s biggest spenders by far; with $74 million in average annual football spending, Alabama shells out 30% more than the next-highest-spending program in the country.)
Most rights of income media travel through conventions, largely thanks to their television transactions and mass express networks. The dry network even ruled in the era of cord cut; 10 of the 15 of the most productive income groups call dry at home, and last year, the SEC distributed more than $ 43 million through the School of Members. The numbers of our team do not constitute last season, however, Big Ten schools are now headed, even their dry competition at the convention’s source of income: thanks to the new television agreements with ESPN and Fox, Big Had distributed $ 54 million to each school member receiving a full part.
The significance of the convention, which also includes proceeds from the bowl game, which will add the school football playoffs and the NCAA basketball tournament, couldn’t be clearer in our rankings: The SEC and the Big Ten dominate our list, combining for 17 of 17 the 25 plus. The valuable equipment. No other convention has more than 3 groups in the 25 most sensible.
Perhaps it’s surprising, then, that independent Notre Dame ranks eighth, with average annual revenue of $120 million. The lack of conference-level revenue doesn’t hold the Irish back, however, since Notre Dame has one of the nation’s biggest fan bases. That’s allowed the team to cash in on an NBC broadcasting deal reportedly worth $15 million annually. In addition, revenues from Notre Dame’s football ticket lottery are not reflected here—that money goes straight to the university and thus doesn’t land on the athletic department’s books—so the Irish’s performance is all the more impressive. Only four teams are more profitable.
Falling off the list this year is Texas Tech. Others just missing the cut include Minnesota, TCU and Utah.
The smart news for those programs? Clemson has shown the way to the maximum sensible 25: all you want is some championship -shaped appearances and a good victories scheduled for the maximum dominant team in the history of the game.
• AVG of three years. Income: $ 77 million
• Three-Year Avg. Profit: $27M
• Three-year AVG. Revenue: $84 million
• 3-year-old AVG. Profit: $ million
• 3-year-old AVG. Revenue: $86 million
• 3 -year -old AVG. Benefit: $ million
• 3 -year -old AVG. Income: $ 87 million
• 3 -year -old AVG. Benefit: $ million
• Three-Year Avg. Revenue: $89M
• 3 -year -old AVG. Benefit: $ million
• Three-year AVG. Revenue: $91 million
• 3 -year -old AVG. Benefit: $ million
• 3-year-old AVG. Revenue: $ million
• Three-Year Avg. Profit: $43M
• 3 -year -old AVG. Income: $ millions
• 3-year-old AVG. Profit: $ million
• Three-year AVG. Revenue: $95 million
• Three-year AVG. Profit: $53 million
• Three-Year Avg. Revenue: $95M
• Three-Year Avg. Profit: $53M
• AVG of three years. Income: $ 96 million
• Three-Year Avg. Profit: $40M
• 3 -year -old AVG. Income: $ millions
• Three-year AVG. Profit: $56M
• Three-year AVG. Revenue: $104 million
• 3 -year -old AVG. Benefit: $ million
• Three-Year Avg. Revenue: $113M
• Three-year AVG. Profit: $59 million
• Three-Year Avg. Revenue: $114M
• AVG of three years. BENEFIT: $ 73 million
• 3-year-old AVG. Revenue: $117 million
• 3-year-old AVG. Profit: $ million
• AVG of three years. Income: $ 117m
• Three-Year Avg. Profit: $69M
• 3-year-old AVG. Revenue: $ million
• Three-year AVG. Profit: $76M
• Three-Year Avg. Revenue: $125M
• 3 -year -old AVG. Benefit: $ million
• 3 -year -old AVG. Income: $ 129 million
• 3 -year -old AVG. Benefit: $ million
• Three-Year Avg. Revenue: $132M
• AVG of three years. BENEFIT: $ 75 million
• AVG of three years. Income: $ 134 million
• 3 -year -old AVG. Benefit: $ million
• AVG of three years. Income: $ 139 million
• 3-year-old AVG. Profit: $ million
• 3 -year -old AVG. Income: $ 147 million
• Three-Year Avg. Profit: $92M
• Three-Year Avg. Revenue: $147M
• AVG of three years. BENEFIT: $ 94 million
Our list of the most valuable college football groups is ranked through the average football revenue source in the 2015, 2016 and 2017 seasons, the recent 3 maximum for which monetary knowledge must be held (2018 figures will not be reported before the end of the year). Revenue is rounded up to the nearest millions, and the source of revenue ties is damaged by employing average annual operating profit. We have the knowledge reported to the NCAA and the Ministry of Education, and we have made changes to line items such as contributions and fees to correct differences in accounting practices.
Photos: Be M. Haffey, Brett Deering, Norm Hall and Michael Reaves / Getty Images.
It is a play of thumbs and dollars. Get the most recent news and sports analysis, one week in its reception box, from the Playbook Forbes SportsMoney Bulletin. Register here.