Release date: Tuesday, August 11, 2020 12:04 p.m.
A week after achieving “a breakthrough in negotiations” to point to Jadon Sancho for 70 million pounds, he went to the boat for Man United.
It can also be an incredibly transparent reminiscence of the club that repeats itself verbatim in many other uninsoluted media. Anybody or.
However, it’s amazing how everyone can get the same lines from the club while being so strangely remote when interpreting secure information.
Take Sancho’s salary, for example:
“The club needs to be offering a great incentive to be offering a value of 220,000 euros per week. But Sancho is closer to 250,000 euros” – The Sun.
“The foreigner from England is United’s number one target in the movement window and has reached an agreement with the club with a base salary of around ‘250,000’ consistent with the week” – The Guardian.
“United has to pay Sancho the 300,000 euros according to the week demanded through the player’s representatives” – Daily Mirror.
So is it already agreed or “holds” 250,000 euros a week, or do your representatives ask for 50,000 more while United contributes 30,000 euros less?
They’ll probably communicate with each other.
There is confusion about the distribution of costs:
“United’s hierarchy still believes that an agreement can be reached, but they don’t need to pay more than 70 million pounds for Ole Gunnar Solskjaer’s main goal.”
“The two clubs are still a long way off in terms of what 20-year-old Sancho is willing to pay 80 million pounds for it, believing it to be a fair value in the market for moving back to Covid” – Daily Mirror.
“United will pay an initial amount of 90 million pounds (100 million euros) in 3 annual installments and another 18 million pounds in performance-related add-ons” – The Guardian.
A motion of 70 million euros / 80 million euros / 90 million euros for a player of 220,000 euros / 250,000 euros / 300,000 euros in line with the week. These negotiations seem a little problematic.
“MANCHESTER UNITED is about to win Jadon Sancho on a record one million pound contract,” he wrote on August 3.
“MANCHESTER UNITED has given up Jadon Sancho’s touchdown,” he wrote on August 10.
You wouldn’t think when they’re so close.
“But United will be forced to meet the deadline set by Borussia Dortmund next Monday to signal the 20-year-old English superstar,” he wrote on 3 August.
“But they were frustrated by the player’s pay demands and Borussia Dortmund’s refusal to deal with them,” he wrote on 10 August.
Perhaps if they were “intimidated” to recruit one of the young players from the World Cup and a club purpose reported for 3 years, they wouldn’t be so “frustrated.”
“There has been a breakthrough in the negotiations, as the red devils have forced the Germans to settle for staggered payments, with 70 million pounds in advance,” he wrote on August 3.
“United needs to pay an initial amount of 70 million pounds, which can reach 110 million pounds depending on honors and appearances. But Dortmund needs more for the 20-year-old england wing,” he wrote on 10 August.
Doesn’t it matter what Dortmund need if United “forces the Germans” to settle for what it proposes?
“Sancho will sign a four-year, 220,000-euro contract consistent with the week, with the club extending for one year,” he wrote on August 3.
“The club needs to be offering a great incentive by offering a value of 220,000 euros per week. But Sancho has more than 250,000 euros,” he wrote on August 10.
This “sign of will” was extraordinarily definitive, with no room for manoeuvre. How is this a “I want to offer” in seven days?
Of course, things change, especially when it comes to discussions of high-level movements between two parties that they may feel influenced. But that ignores the fact that Custis told everyone that the deal was already made and that United had won a week before admitting that the opposite was close to the truth, all without explanation.
It’s smart to be wrong. Mediawatch does it often. Like a place less than a million miles from here. But at least conform and hug him instead of pretending to know when he obviously doesn’t know.
Replays showed Greenwood offside on the one-metre part when he clung to Marcus Rashford’s head and the purpose prevailed. ”
You can remove “half a meter” from this sentence and it makes a lot of sense. Or you can consciously continue to feed some kind of controversy.
“The VAR himself had denied them a previous penalty in the minute.”
Also for two offside under construction. The VAR did not “deny” them anything. You have implemented regulations at all times, even if you would recommend otherwise.
But Dortmund need more advantage, and judging by tonight’s performance, they’re waiting for a call tomorrow.
“That’s because the Red Devils fought desperately to break a team that had a hundred to one to win the Europa League before the start.”
“The team of a guy who controlled a hundred against one to win the Europa League before kick-off” is “a team that has not scored more than one goal in its last 28 European matches, dating back to July 2018.”
Not if they, you know, point to Jadon Sancho.
“The quality of Sancho’s equivalent will make a difference in europe’s elite competition, especially with its rope defense.
“Maguire, the world’s greatest-loved defender, has the speed to face Europe’s highest nonviolent attack forces.
“There is no doubt that the last four who played tonight will lose goals in the Premier League and Champions League.”
Well, the side four had literally never played in combination in this formula until Monday. So, whether they would “run away from the targets” or not, that’s not the problem. It’s not United’s first-choice defense.
He’s not the only one who preaches caution. “The Red Devils look shaky in the back,” also one of five speech topics the Daily Mirror picked up while watching a team stay on a blank sheet for 120 minutes.
United awarded three more than Liverpool. Do the champions have a “rope defense” that “will make the fugue”?
“In Santos, they pulled out a Robinho doll for sale to fans. Robinho didn’t like it: “He’s ugly and he’s nothing like me.” Its space has its own disco, with soundproof walls. He is 36 years old, still having fun, with magic on his feet and happiness in his soul. And, as the City knows, he never set foot in Manchester again.”
“Always have fun” and “happiness in the soul” is an old way of describing a guy convicted of rape in November 2017.
The name’s good. The use of quotes from Kevin Phillips on the pretext that he knows what Divock Origi thinks, and a photo with James Milner at the front and center, is not.
Update your browser to view this website. Update my browser now
×