Wage cuts for COVID-19 school football coaches are not what they seem

As school athletics departments began dealing with the budgetary rubble of COVID-19, it became obvious that football coaches would bear a fair percentage of the money burden.

In Texas, athletics director Chris Del Conte announced that his branch fired 35 workers and fired a dozen more, however, coach Tom Herman would be among those who would benefit from a voluntary wage cut for transitoryness of about 15% of his salary. While North Carolina expected an eight-figure deficit in athletics, Coach Mack Brown agreed to reduce his salary by 20%, and in central Michigan, coach Jim McElwain agreed to lose 6% of his salary, which the school said according to other campus executives.

In those and other cases, however, wage cuts were not what they seemed.

The Longhorns reduced Herman’s salary, but agreed to pay him back before his contract ended. Brown’s pay cut was deducted from a detail of his earnings as a bachelor (his base salary of $750,000) instead of the $3. 5 million earned overall.

And when metaphorical dust settled for McElwain, who earned more than $17 million in three terms as head coach, his salary cut $6,000.

“He’s smart when, after his pay cut, he still makes millions of dollars,” said Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn. ), a staunch critic of the monetary style in elementary school sports. “I don’t know if those pay cuts will result in any of those coaches being evicted from their subdivisions.

As a component of its annual pay-as-you-go review, USA TODAY Sports compiled and analyzed the salaries of head coaches in the Football Bowl Branch, as it has done since 2006, but this time, this knowledge also includes detailed compensation accounting. that head coaches have suffered, or suffered, as a result of the coronavirus pandemic.

USA TODAY Sports found that transition pay reduces diversity from just getting rid of a $80 monthly mobile phone allowance (in Louisiana-Lafayette) to $1. 25 million (at Clemson). But taken together, they show that head coaches have been largely estranged from the broader monetary demand situations of their universities and sports departments.

Of the 104 head coaches for which data on pay discounts were provided, more than 40% did not settle for a pay cut or were not asked to do so. Of the 59 coaches whose salaries have been reduced, the average relief represents just under 9% of their total salary for the year, which, on average, is about $3 million for this group.

Three schools, Memphis, Penn State and Purdue, announced that their football coaches were accepting pay cuts, but refused to express USA TODAY Sports questions about the nature of the cuts.

While a handful of football coaches give up amounts over $500,000, or make giant donations to their schools to help cushion the monetary shock, principals have sometimes tried to paint them as equals, getting the same percentage discounts as other workers in the department or on campus.

“At the end of the day, we seek the same treatment,” Ohio State Athletic Director Gene Smith told reporters when asked about the 5% uniform reductions in his department.

However, at the FBS level, football coaches are the highest-paid staff in their universities and, in many cases, the highest-paid public workers in their states.

Bob Lattinville, a lawyer at the law firm Spencer Fane LLP, said some of the pay cuts for coaches ended up being both optics and genuine savings for their universities.

“Obviously, a lot of other people suffer financially, and if (coaches) don’t do something that necessarily identifies with the rest of the other people, many of whom are going to support the school and (don’t) feel their pain, then I think it’s a bad look,” said Lattinville, who helps USA TODAY Sports with its compilation and research of the coaches’ pay.

“Again, it’s not that wage cuts are ceremonial. They’re important. But for the maximum Array component . . . you throw cash over dollars. “

The coronavirus pandemic affected U. S. schools and universities as a freight train, tuition figures have been reduced, and coVID-19 considerations, such as on-campus training testing or new technologies for distance education, have led to higher costs. In May, Congress included a $37 bill in higher education investment, offering monetary assistance, but last month, an organization of industry leaders wrote to Congress to tell them they billed at least $120 more.

FBS’s sports departments, some of which get up to 70% of their investment from college, government or student rates, have dealt with problems.

With the cancellation of March Madness and some empty or partially crowded football stadiums, once-full departments have resorted to belt adjustment: spending cuts, vacations and, in some cases, the elimination of complete sports systems. Kevin White said last week that at least 230 school sports systems had been discontinued so far due to COVID-19, adding 104 in Division I.

“The bottom line, I think everyone will want to know, is that American higher education, just athletics, is bleeding like never before,” White said at a virtual assembly of the U. S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee.

At the most sensitive point in Division I, the FBS, coaches’ salaries have been on a steep slope for many years, making them potentially ripe to be reduced. So now that times are tough, why doesn’t that happen?From unilaterally cutting a football coach’s contract to layoffs or saving his tennis program?

Martin Greenberg, a Milwaukee-based sports lawyer and an assistant professor at Marquette University, said it simply: legally, in maximum schools, they can’t.

“I am in favor of a legal explanation why know how to terminate those contracts,” Greenberg said. “And I can’t locate any. “

Contracts provide a layer of coverage for coaches who, at most, other college workers do not have, making some payment as long as they fulfill their duties. And Greenberg said the force majeure language to the fullest of those agreements, which could give schools room for manoeuvre to make adjustments in unpredictable cases, such as a global pandemic, is not complicated enough to face a judicial challenge.

Instead, coaches and directors of the athletics branch will have to interact in a cautious dance, linked to the preference of having a smart career date and an understanding of how their movements will be perceived through the audience.

“There is no legal right to make the reduction, in fact from a contractual point of view. And there is no legal responsibility to have a drink,” said Lattinville, who represents coaches and schools. “I think it’s a smart deal on either party, agreeing to do it. “

In some cases, voluntary discounts have generated significant savings for the school. Clemson’s Dabo Swinney, who is earning $8. 3 million this year, is giving up a $1 million withholding payment and a $250,000 build-up that would have been introduced in a different way below. Mike Norvell’s relay in the state of Florida is just above $968,000, or 25% of his salary.

By contrast, forty-five schools told USA TODAY Sports that their football coaches have not yet been eliminated, adding the country’s two highest-paid coaches: Nick Saban of Alabama and Ed Orgeron of LSU, who are expected to earn $9. 3 million and $8. 9 million this year. . Respectively.

But in Alabama and LSU, pay cuts were necessary. Sports departments gain advantages from quasi-independent investment branches that have tens of millions of dollars in reserve, according to their most recent monetary statements. And university spokespersons said their respective campuses had been licensed. or pay cuts at any time so far.

Earlier this year, when a full-throttle football season was unlikely, North Carolina athletics director Bubba Cunningham predicted his branch could face a monetary deficit of up to $50 million for the year. We had to make cuts.

In March, for example, Cunningham put expenses and hiring in a position to freeze. Three months later, he budgeted and turned to reserve funds.

In making those cuts, Cunningham asked his football coach, Brown, to accept a 20% pay cut, like everyone else in the athletic branch who earn $200,000 or more. But after seeking 20% of his full refund, $3. 5 million, Cunningham implemented the $750,000 cut to Brown’s base salary alone. The resulting relief was $112,500, a 3% relief in what Brown will do this year.

“It’s one of the choices we make to try to be fair and fair to the branch and the individual,” Cunningham said. “It’s a matter of judgment. “

North Carolina is the only school that took this approach.

In Indiana, coach Tom Allen agreed to take 10% relief on his base salary, which is $500,000, as opposed to his total repayment of $3. 77 million for this year, adding a $1 million signing bonus.

At Marshall, a similar pay cut caused coach Doc Holliday to lose $7,000 and he will have to earn $765,320 in full compensation. (Holliday also resigned from his school-funded club at a local country club, valued at $8,000, according to the athletics spokesmans branch).

Greenberg, the lawyer, said he thought it would be a trap for a school to announce a percentage cut and apply it only to a component of a coach’s salary.

“I’d be disappointed, ” he said. Wages mean nothing. We have to take all the elements of the coach’s money package. That’s what they earn. “

Central Michigan said McElwain would take a 6% cut in his base salary, but his reimbursement for media appearances ($365,000) and his annual withholding bonus ($50,000) were affected.

Two weeks after the announcement, Chippe eliminated their indoor and outdoor men’s track and box programs, affecting 36 athletes and expected to save around $629,000, leaving them with only five men’s sports teams, which is below the threshold required to be an FBS member. The school granted a two-year exemption in June to remain in the FBS.

Former athletics director Michael Alford, who was overseeing the branch at the time, did not respond to USA TODAY Sports messages. Downtown Michigan refused to make his replacement, Amy Folan or McElwain, available for interviews.

Some schools have taken small but artistic approaches to cut wages, temporarily getting rid of benefits in their coaches’ contracts, such as a monthly allowance for cell phone use or car rental.

Others have been disposed of or limited from bonus provisions, limiting them to lower amounts.

A handful of schools, adding Indiana and Iowa, have allowed coaches to pay their salaries and donate the amount that would have been reduced to college. Tax law experts have stated that the benefits of these agreements are probably negligible to coaches.

Purdue has announced a combination of discounts and donations. He said in a press release that Coach Jeff Brohm and three others would settle for voluntary wage cuts of 20% over 12 months, but they also jointly pledged $1 million for athletic breakdown “as a component of their pay cut. “

The spokesman for the Athletics Department, Kassidie Blackstock, refused to say whether wage cuts and donations related to the same funds.

Elsewhere, some presented their coaches with more than flexibility when asked to accept a transition pay cut. Cunningham said North Carolina coaches had won one-month extensions of their contracts due to their cuts.

“In an effort to get them to replace the contract, we felt we had to offer them the opportunity to do so. So that’s what we did,” he said. ” We just negotiated: “Take this reduction now, we. “I’ll do anything for you later. “

At least one in Texas has already taken this concept to the extreme, promising to reimburse coaches of all sports for cut amounts and necessarily turning pay cuts into postponements.

For Herman, whose pay cut was implemented only on his base salary, this means he will lose $516250 this year, but will be reimbursed until the end of 2023.

“We’ve had a COVID challenge for a year,” Del Conte said last week. “These coaches, we had a contractual obligation, and I asked them if I could pay them that amount of money. They said yes, because they knew I had to comply with that because we had (a) contract. “

Lattinville said the idea that many schools will eventually commit to taking such action and making their apprentices complete. They probably wouldn’t commemorate the plans in a contract amendment like Texas did, he said. But when the pandemic is over and the revenue runs out. again in circulation, perhaps a trainer who has accepted a $200,000 pay cut will get a one-time withholding bonus of the same amount, or a small increase.

“Will you realize the fact that the coach accepted a pay cut and will treat them accordingly, withdraw to return that cash to them?I think absolutely,” Lattinville said. These conversations are coming.

In the eyes of Murphy, the U. S. Senator, some of the pay relief agreements for football coaches offer new evidence of what he sees as a damaged monetary style in school sports: a formula in which coaches and sports departments earn millions, while athletes are paid for by scholarships.

“It shows how all-powerful school football coaches are,” Murphy said, calling postponements disguised as pay cuts, like texas, a “joke. “

“These coachesArray . . . run those universities in many ways. It’s the paid employees. Your risk of leaving can shake up a campus. They just have too much strength and get a lot of cash. “

The consequences of COVID-19 might not fundamentally adjust the design of force in college athletics, but would possibly lead to some changes.

The force majeure language in coach contracts is already being rewritten, to make it more express and less difficult to apply. More schools will use a contractual way to reduce wages, than rely on volunteers. refund more directly similar to revenue-generating events, such as games played, rather than receiving guaranteed lump sums.

“We pay a bonus if we train an extra game, like a bowling game,” Cunningham said. “It would make sense to do it in advance, if you train fewer games. “

In the end, however, the pandemic turns out to be a little more than an obstacle in the training market in general. The average salary increases by about 7% each year. At least 33 coaches now have acquisitions of $10 million or more, so it’s almost for schools that lose cash to fire them. And even as the pandemic breaks out, at least two coaches have won contract extensions in recent months: a monetary praise for a well-done task.

Contributor: Brian Davis

Contact Tom Schad at tschad@usatoday. com or on Twitter @Tom_Schad. Follow Steve Berkowitz on Twitter @ByBerkowitz.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *