Release date: Monday, September 7, 2020 9:46 AM
Send your Arsenal documentaries to [email protected]
So Danny Rose sought to know what the challenge was and why he wasn’t betting on the Spurs.
I think it’s pretty obvious. Joseph (not Joseph) made it clear that there were 90 minutes in which players could not be nice.For 90 minutes, he needs them to be a bunch of C.C smart, not stupid C.Es transparent if you ask me..
Danny turns out to have a little challenge with not being nice, especially because he denigrating his teammates so gently, and the juniors in addition, with the cameras on.What a wonderful leader he is not. What a forged style it probably wouldn’t be, what a herself-oriented backpack she is.He has no worries at all.
The challenge arises with the bit/fool. Danny “hot head, red card, calamity, out of position, loose tackle, reckless” Rose in a football box is a little short in this regard.
However, my main topic of conversation (and this taken from some podcasts I listened to) would be what old season would you have looked for to watch a documentary for your own club?Of course, enthusiasts will have to decide what the peak season of success is.of his club, I sense that it would be desirable to see internally the absolute elite, however, what if you had to decide for a season that is not necessarily glorious, but full of drama and the impartial fanatic would appreciate the increases?and low, or basically low if you like?
As an Arsenal fan, there are some who stand out:
90/91.Tony Adams was sent mid-season criminal, the massive fight opposed to man U, having been tied up 2 issues and nevertheless earned the name with only 1 lost game, and a football game that denies George Graham’s boring label.
96/97 The dismissal of Rioch, Unknown Arséne Wenger entering the locker room, combined with French and English players and only to see the genuine reactions of Arsenal players when Wenger his new strategies or essentially not having 10 pints 3 times a week
Now, realistically, we are in what I would call phase 2 of Frank Lampard’s plan for Chelsea.In the first phase, we brought the most productive young players to our side, they will indulge themselves and move on to the Premier League. and qualify for the Champions League. It went quite well. Now, in my opinion, phase 2 is at least a challenge for the title. I remain of the opinion that this is not a FIFA or Football Manager game, the new recruits, especially the number we brought in, not only bring the world It can happen and I am sure there are many, however, it can happen a time before our new crop does. I hope I am wrong and that we are one of the groups that have the chance to gain advantages from a team that is spoiling in its first season and that we are lifting a trophy.
In short, I would say that a name challenge is a must before the 20/21 season, as well as a smart race in the Champions League.Now, for me, if we finish 2 or 3 and at least revery one.the UCL quarter-finals and maybe lifted a national cup would be a smart campaign.Many enthusiastic rivals can argue, other Chelsea enthusiasts can argue, but that’s exactly what I’m seeing right now.City and Liverpool are much more complex in their progression as more sensitive groups, their groups have been built under the direction of managers who have spent a lot of time at the helm and all know each other very well, but you never know in the world of crazy football.
I’m excited to see the answers to my Friday post about ‘Dream Career Paths’, so to respond to Steve about which managers he’d rather paint with, I’d choose:
Development: Arsene Wenger (known for giving young people a chance, so that I would have a chance to play)
Big Move at 21: Julian Nagelsmann (Is it going to be the next big step?And how he evolved his players into this old organization in Leipzig and Hoffenheim)
Big Move at 24: Pep Guardiola (Learning your taste at this age is realistic, I would be the master of the past)
Big Move at 27: Mauricio Pochettino (What a great guy he is, tactically wise too, feels at this age for me)
Luke Byrne asks, “What does good luck look like for Chelsea this season?”by proposing that, given the money we spend this year, any victory in PL or CL would seem like a failure.I agree with that. I fully admit that bets have increased this year, BUT we overded it last year.Most Chelsea enthusiasts will tell you last year that we were pleasantly surprised by a fourth position and if you had asked a skilled and top enthusiast this time last year, the maximum would be given us a tip for 5th place.
Losing Hazard, who was a large fish in a slightly functional pond that covered many cracks for too long.We were so dependent on him for the Conte and Sari seasons that I barely noticed how we control to win PL and IS at the time.We haven’t been a “TEAM” for years, but a set of functional players who offer a platform for a superstar.
Arsenal enthusiasts will soon realize how mediocre Willian is, Pedro is a smart pro but has never set global fire. We haven’t had a first-class striker since Conte’s first season, our defense has been based on left-backs that can’t stay defenders up and center that don’t like to communicate with each other.The only functional domain on the field is the midfield, however, while Kante, Jorginho and Kovacic are smart players, none of them threaten a goal.We played five other tactical systems in 3 years under 3 other managers, all with variable success.
Then there’s the doorman’s situation, Courtios’ last-minute exit in 2018, and Kepa’s panicked takeover is nothing less than a disaster, how can you disappoint a 72 million-pounder you signed a seven-year contract with?Fuss.
To this day, we have original quality in almost every space in the field, but little experience. The five players entering the team are all the first players of the XI. No sensible team buys the five most sensible XI players at once, so is consistency.
What does good fortune look like this year? Consistency, a padded finish in the maximum sense 4, close the hole with the maximum sense of the table and an uninterrupted progression of the young players of the club.I would never say that we cannot simply not win the League or the CL, but the “good fortune” of our greatest beloved player of all time will be judged by the way we judged each and every European supermanator we had, Frank and Petr Cech are not there to win trophies, they are there to build a club and give us an identity.
Hopefully in 3 years we will not start the season wondering if we will finish 1st or 10th or if the new coach will have to send 6 players to buy the 4 players that he wants to adapt to the formula he wants to play. It will move to a more biological and holistic style of team and club control and (sticks to the throat a bit) it will copy Liverpool’s style of supporting a coach and giving him the area to create a team and the successors of control (if necessary) that can work within existing structures.
This is not uncharted territory: groups can fill that long deficit, especially if the groups that precede them do not reach their previous levels, and there is also the small consultation of all groups starting from scratch.
I saw england and Iceland fit in (very good article through the way Matt) and Maguire’s remarkable header was a huge mistake.Then I saw a “Hit Abroad” ad in National Geographic.
I also tried to get nicknames for my team’s players, to mention nicknames like Rashy or Lingz.He talks about NBA nicknames, such as De’Arron fox AKA Swipa.
So I’ve had Mason ‘The Dream’ Greenwood, Daniel Flash James AKA ‘Barry’, Paul ‘accelerates and fails’ Pogba AKA M.Box office, Capt.”Harry ‘Maguire AKA 80 million prince.
It took time and many words, but William nevertheless implied.
Don’t you worry, William, that everyone who crossed your argument saw that comment come from your first paragraph?And it’s rarely very smart that you have a mailbox on an online football page that prints your political reviews as opposed to theirs, even if you don’t need political reviews on an online football page?
With regard to Marcus Rashford’s crusade, here’s the trick, having a socialist crusade that’s smart is more likely to make headlines because “feeding deficient young people with taxpayer money” (inherently political) is a bad thing.This is a far-left view. He’s a communist.It is a socialist concept, believe it or Array, it is of a political nature.
“The fact that the government had to worry about making its crusade a good fortune was the only political element.”One thing that seems to have overlooked is that the government was finishing loose food vouchers for young people (I think it was for school …Rashford’s crusade aimed to get this government to make (another) change of meaning and would not have worked if it had not been expanded through the media.In fact, the government rejected Rashford’s crusade earlier, lied about it, and then reversed its resolution, and therefore more people pushed and built the crusade that led to the revocation of the government’s resolution.
I don’t know anything about Marcus Rashford’s broader political views, what I do know is that his political crusade to prevent the government from finishing loose lunch vouchers.
“The policy that has recently taken over football and football journalism is cultural Marxism, an ideology that, among other things, seeks to divide everyone on the basis of race, finesse and sexual orientation.”William, others need equality for everyone, which means to end the divide, the other majors who seek to divide are those who don’t need systemic racism and the sexism that triumphs in football to end because they are the direct beneficiaries.They are the same people who claim that racism/sexism does not exist while sitting on completely white media panels, all men skilled in a football exhibition (with a pretty woguy doing something), and then get angry when there is a trace that a black boy or a woguy has speculated to be included.
Update your browser to demonstrate this correctly Update my browser now
×