YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, Wyo – The traces of the length of a saucer in the dust around the bloodied and gutted bison corpse were undeniable: wolves.
A group of 35 other people named after a nearby snowy promontory, Junction Butte, now slept on a hill above the corpse. Tourists dressed in opposition at the time watched the group with glasses a kilometer away.
“Wolves are what I like best. There’s something in his eyes, it’s disconcerting,” said Ann Moore, who came here from Ohio to satisfy an ancient desire to see the animals.
Such encounters have sometimes become Yellowstone after gray wolves recovered in parts of the American West at a remarkable rate after their reintroduction 25 years ago.
With a few dozen wolves brought in cages from Canada to Yellowstone and central Idaho. Others have roamed northwest Montana. Increasing big game herds, the population has soared to more than 300 herds comprising about 2000 wolves, occupying a territory spanning six states and stretching from the edge of the Great Plains to the forests of the Pacific Northwest.
Colorado’s effort, if successful, can fill a significant void in the ancient range of the species, creating a bridge between the grey wolves of northern Rocky Mountains and the gray wolves of Mexico in the southwest.
“Colorado is the mother vein, the last piece,” said Mike Phillips, who led Yellowstone’s reintroduction task and now sits in the Montana Senate.
However, the wolf perspective annoys Colorado ranchers, who see them as a risk that their ancestors once defeated in high-altitude forests where farm animals graze on public lands. Hunters decimat herds of lads and deer.
It was a resumption of animosity a quarter of a century ago when federal wildlife officials freed the first wolves in Yellowstone. The species had been wiped out in most of the contiguous United States in the early 1900s by government-sponsored poisoning, traps and bounty hunter.
Opponents of the Initiative have seized wolf sightings in northwestern Colorado in recent years as evidence that the predator has arrived and that reintroduction is necessary.
“We can live with a few wolves. That’s the huge amount that scares me,” said Janie VanWinkle, a Mesa County breeder near Grand Junction, Colorado.
VanWinkle’s great-grandparents shot the wolves in sight until the early 1940s, he said, when the last Colorado wolves were killed. The family circle handles farm animals on two headlands with names from that era: Wolf Hill and Dead Horse Point.
But Mesa County’s population has more than quintupled since the last time wolves roamed there, by more than 150,000, and VanWinkle sees little room for animals on farms and the development of recreation crowds outside the country.
“Things have changed,” he says.
The pack that arrived in northwestern Colorado last year is believed to have originated in the Northern Rocky Mountains through Wyoming, where wolves can be killed at will in the open air in the Yellowstone area.
Even the Endangered Species Act, thousands of wolves have been sacrificed over the more than two decades for hunting cattle and, more recently, by hunters.
But the long-oversentful resentment of the recovery of wolves in the region has faded a little since protections rose in recent years. Opponents had the opportunity to hunt wolves legally, while advocates learned that state wildlife officials were not determined to eliminate. animals.
“I have an undeniable message: it’s not that bad,” said Yellowstone wolf biologist Doug Smith, who along with Phillips brought the first wolves to the park in 1995.
“I screamed at public meetings, ” he said. ” I’ve won phone calls: “They’re going to kill all the laces and deer!”Where have we been for 25 years? We still have seas and deer. “
On an incrute October morning, after examining the remains of the bison eaten through junction butte’s herd near a park road, Smith said he asked a colleague to drag the corpse deeper into the undergrowth to continue attracting wolves and other animals. scavengers, could be hit through a vehicle.
Later, as the sun struggled to break through the banks of clouds, he walked through the Valley of the Lamar River in the park to where Canada’s first wolves were released.
Around, there were young poplar stands shaking. The domain had been surpassed through the elces during the years when wolves and grizzly bears and cougars were absent; evidence, Smith said, of the profound ecological effect on the return of predators. .
Dean Billington, Colorado’s game shipowner, predicts an economic crisis if the Wolf 2020 initiative is approved and estimates that his company spends more than $250,000 a year on ranch hunting leases.
“They are rich on land and deficient day by day,” Billington said of ranchers. “This source of income allows Western farmers to stay afloat. “
The initiative calls for the initial advent of 10 wolves according to the year until December 31, 2023, with a target of 250 wolves within a decade.
Rob Edward of the Rocky Mountain Wolf Action Fund, the initiative’s organization, sees reintroduction as a national rather than state factor because he considers public lands that account for 70% of western Colorado.
“Colorado’s public lands are small wolves,” he said.
Yellowstone’s joy is key to his group’s arguments: reintroduction restores ecosystem balance, improves habitat, and benefits hunters by eliminating weaker prey.
Standing in the compound where the Yellowstone Wolves made their debut, Smith said that if Colorado’s initiative is approved, good luck ultimately depends more on human tolerance than on the biological recovery capacity of animals.
“Don’t pick up wolves unless there are spaces where I can leave you alone,” he said.
___
Anderson reported from Denver and Larson from Washington, D. C.